aircobra19
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,733
[broken link removed]
Have to admit I'm not using it anymore.
Have to admit I'm not using it anymore.
[broken link removed]
Have to admit I'm not using it anymore.
To clarify (as people are being picky) : I was in a photo shop. I did not say she was using "photoshop" software.
I did not see the type of media she was using as it was in the machine, could be a media card that she attached to a card writer or even a disc. she said card but maybe she was just using that term.
In any case the point was the shop had previous difficulty getting their print machines to work with media generated through vista.
In relation to the comparison between vista and OSX it is the opinion of many that microsoft used OSX as a template when designing vista as many features are similar.
Also OSX Leopard version is brand new (2 months or so I think)
Does that mean you think it's OK for MS to chuck Vista out the door to paying customers even if it's not (assuming it's not)? So much for their Trustworthy Computing initiative...OS X maybe better then Vista in its current state, but then its 8yrs old. So it should be decent.
Does that mean you think it's OK for MS to chuck Vista out the door to paying customers even if it's not (assuming it's not)? So much for their Trustworthy Computing initiative... ...
...Have to admit I'm not using it anymore.
It doesn't move files and folders reliably. At best it leaves behind empty folders.
That's the digital rights management crap.
I'm going to hang onto XP for as long as possible.
Ditto. XP Pro + SP2 is far preferable, although I personally like Ubuntu (I stick to Debian based distros), and I really don't like OS X. Vixta might interest those who want the look of Vista but Linux underneath (It's based on Fedora8).After many years in IT I don't have the patience for Vista.
I've experience two friends vista pc's from dell and I have to say in terms of usefull ness its a step backwards. They are incredibile slow despite having the dell recommended 1gb of memory.
MS office (old version) wouldn't work and avi's wouldn't play even after the codec were installed. In fact you get directed to MS site to buy codecs that were free before.
Worst of all by far is the sheer slowness of it. Takes about 8 minutes to boot and that was pout of the box.
I suspect you're right and theres a bug in it somewhere. I can only spend a finite amount of time looking for a solution so I've moved on... I don't have the patience for Vista.