Health Insurance Laya Do Not Cover Cast Application - Procedure Code 3130

anseof

Registered User
Messages
14
Hi, my son is covered under Laya Simply Connect Plus, which I thought was a policy with good cover. I had done my due diligence, as far as I could, in terms of comparing against other policies. He is a toe walker and had both legs put into casts last week in the National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh as a day patient (he was in the day ward with all other patients public or private). He had his initial outpatient appointment with the private clinic at Temple Street. Prior to the procedure I had asked the consultant for the procedure code, but they said don’t worry it is in a public hospital and the consultant is covered under all insurances. My mistake, I know, for not insisting on getting the details.

I filled in the Laya Claim form on admission to the hospital. I had a bill on Tuesday from the hospital with no explanation of what it was for – it just says ‘self payers – intervention’. The value is €329 which matches their charge for private patients for a day case. I’ve asked them to send me a more detailed invoice and asked them to send me details of what, if anything, they were billing to Laya. I am waiting on a response. When I spoke with them, they had no details on procedure codes as they were awaiting the consultant's notes. They mentioned that maybe I got a bill because he also had injections into his calf muscles and that they ‘thought’ Laya doesn’t cover them, but they weren’t sure. I basically got a bill, but they don't know why!

Here is the interesting bit – I called Laya today to ask about all of this. The private clinic had given me some codes this morning that they think might be the codes for the procedures (but they said I need the hospital to confirm). Code 4263 for the injections and 3130 for the application of casts. Laya told me that they cover the injections (4263) but that they do not cover this procedure under any of their policies. They said none of their policies cover it. I am so shocked that such a simple procedure is not covered. The most annoying part is that my son will be having the casts taken off and re-applied every 2-3 weeks over the next 3 months, so many multiples of €329 will be invoiced to me. In fact, I’m waiting for the hospital to confirm if I’ll be liable for other charges too at each visit.

I see that other insurers give access to their ‘Schedule of Benefits’ where you can see all the procedure codes. I have requested this from Laya, but I am not sure they will send it on. How are we supposed to be sure how suitable our policies are without such documents? At least if we have access to these before renewals, we might be able to change insurers (especially if we know it is a couple of years before we might need a procedure). To be honest, with such a simple procedure as cast application I would not have even considered that it would be something Laya wouldn’t cover, especially in a public hospital. As my son may need this treatment again in a few years, I will have to look at changing insurer at next renewal.



I feel so let down by the whole system. He has had this problem since he was 3 and I was always given the same response “he will grow out of it” or “I’m treating other children who will never walk, your son’s issue is not serious”. So, for years I played along with the public system and now that he’s 12, hasn’t grown out of it and will soon start secondary I resorted to going the private route. Now I find myself having to pay for the procedures because he was referred to the hospital on a private waiting list and the insurance won’t cover it. I’m so mad with myself for not insisting years ago that he be put on a public waiting list for this procedure. I’m kind of just ranting here as I don’t think there is anything I can do about it. But maybe someone has experienced this where Laya does not cover cast application (procedure code 3130)?
 
Tallaght hospital, Cappagh Hospital, CUH and others have private departments.

It is not made clear what the differences are between the care, access to consultations nor treatment.
It does seem that by going private - things are very different.
A child in Ireland is meant to treated on the public system as there is very little private hospital care for children.
I was under the impression that Cappagh hospital provided private care for acute problems but it seems I was wrong.


When you stated that LAYA have said that "they do not cover this procedure under any of their policies"
- what exactly do they not cover under any of their policies?
- If it is a condition that requires treatment, how can they not cover some of it?

-------------------------------------
National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh has 159 beds, catering for both public and private patients. National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh is an independent Voluntary Hospital founded in 1908 under the care of the Sisters of Charity. It was once renowned for its ‘Open Air’ wards and for its surgical treatment of children with TB from the 1920s.


 
I have no experience with Laya.

But I've have over the years had lots of lengthy battles with children's hospitals trying to bill me (or my insurer) for public treatments as private. Usually an un-itemized bill. Every-time I queried it, I got a difference answer, when I was able to refute their reason, they would then change the reason. Last time they ran out of reasons, simply said the consultant/surgeon requested it. When I brought it to the attention of my insurer they weren't interested. So I gave up, just let the insurance pay it.

But this is one of the reasons why insurance is so expensive and treatments are so expensive.
 
I have had the same experience. An elderly relative who lives in rural Ireland and undergoing specialist medical treatment was billed identical consultant services both by the hospital consultant who was supervising his treatment in Dublin and the consultant who was supervising his treatment in his local hospital. On the advice of another relative who is a nurse specialist in the same field of medicine and was absolutely horrified by this, I queried the bills but to no avail. I also queried the double billing with Laya which was the insurer in this case but they did not pursue it.

 
When you stated that LAYA have said that "they do not cover this procedure under any of their policies"
- what exactly do they not cover under any of their policies?
- If it is a condition that requires treatment, how can they not cover some of it?
@Curlyfella Laya told me that 'cast application' (code 3130) is not covered at all by Laya. It seems so strange that something so simple would not be covered. So, as an example, I asked if I was in the hospital with a broken leg would they not cover the application of a cast. They said that it would most likely be that I would be in a public hospital in the first instance and the cast application would be done via A&E and therefore covered by the A&E charge. They said that if I presented to a private A&E then they would get an itemised bill for my treatment and that the element related to the application of the cast would not be covered.
 
I have had the same experience. An elderly relative who lives in rural Ireland and undergoing specialist medical treatment was billed identical consultant services both by the hospital consultant who was supervising his treatment in Dublin and the consultant who was supervising his treatment in his local hospital. On the advice of another relative who is a nurse specialist in the same field of medicine and was absolutely horrified by this, I queried the bills but to no avail. I also queried the double billing with Laya which was the insurer in this case but they did not pursue it.

@Mocame I have had no reply from the hospital on requesting an itemised bill. Surprise surprise.
 
I have no experience with Laya.

But I've have over the years had lots of lengthy battles with children's hospitals trying to bill me (or my insurer) for public treatments as private. Usually an un-itemized bill. Every-time I queried it, I got a difference answer, when I was able to refute their reason, they would then change the reason. Last time they ran out of reasons, simply said the consultant/surgeon requested it. When I brought it to the attention of my insurer they weren't interested. So I gave up, just let the insurance pay it.

But this is one of the reasons why insurance is so expensive and treatments are so expensive.
@AlbacoreA It seems like I am facing a similar situation, only in this case the insurer won't pay and the hospital won't provide an itemised bill so that I can at least know what I am paying for.
 
Is it possibly due to your particular plan not covering the hospital attended? It seems very very strange that if there is a code, in MOST cases, this is billed direct from the hospital to the insurer.

On a separate note, when a claim form is signed by the patient (or guardian) there is very little that can be done by the insurer. There is a tick the box question about electing to be admitted as a private patient and if ticked and form signed, the hospital are within their rights to bill and be paid.
 
Can one appeal to am ombudsman? Does the financial services ombudsman cover health insurance? Or even just the general ombudsman?
 
Financial service ombudsman deals with health insurance. You will need a final response letter from your insurer before FSO will entertain.
 
Is it possibly due to your particular plan not covering the hospital attended? It seems very very strange that if there is a code, in MOST cases, this is billed direct from the hospital to the insurer.

On a separate note, when a claim form is signed by the patient (or guardian) there is very little that can be done by the insurer. There is a tick the box question about electing to be admitted as a private patient and if ticked and form signed, the hospital are within their rights to bill and be paid.
No, the plan is good - Simply Connect Plus. Laya said they don't cover they procedure under any plan.
It was a surprise to me to be billed as I had thought they would bill the Laya direct. But as you said, I did sign at the hospital to be covered by insurance, so I guess it's not a surprise to be billed by the hospital if the procedure is not covered by them. I just didn't expect that such a simple procedure would not be covered by insurance. I'm also annoyed that the hospital are ignoring my request for a detailed invoice. I really want to be sure of what they are charging me for and what they bill directly to Laya.
 
I genuinely find that surprising that its not covered under any of their plans? I don't deal with Laya much but I know for certain that code is billed direct from the hospital to VHI with no problem.

Refuse to pay until you get itemised invoice, keep records of contacts you have made looking for same and when Medserve send their letter threatening legal action for non-payment, reply with the attempts you have made to ascertain what you are being billed for.

That being said I agree with you that it is completely wrong that Laya won't cover it.
 
I genuinely find that surprising that its not covered under any of their plans? I don't deal with Laya much but I know for certain that code is billed direct from the hospital to VHI with no problem.

Refuse to pay until you get itemised invoice, keep records of contacts you have made looking for same and when Medserve send their letter threatening legal action for non-payment, reply with the attempts you have made to ascertain what you are being billed for.

That being said I agree with you that it is completely wrong that Laya won't cover it.
@kitty81 thanks for the advice. Yes, I am totally surprised about this too, but this is what Laya told me over the phone and they also sent me an email stating this.
 
This is very odd. Why is a simple process not covered? I have logged into Laya and tried to see if my husband was covered for 3130 in Cappagh It said to contact them about it, so no yes or no. He has total health extra. Why do private health companies make it so complicated. Why is there a clear list of what is covered and not covered? I have been caught on a few simple things in the last year, a Dexa scan not covered because Laya do not recognize the scan center, and a counselling session because the specific counsellor was not covered.
 
This is very odd. Why is a simple process not covered? I have logged into Laya and tried to see if my husband was covered for 3130 in Cappagh It said to contact them about it, so no yes or no. He has total health extra. Why do private health companies make it so complicated. Why is there a clear list of what is covered and not covered? I have been caught on a few simple things in the last year, a Dexa scan not covered because Laya do not recognize the scan center, and a counselling session because the specific counsellor was not covered.
@Clamball. That's how I initially found out that the procedure wasn't covered. I logged into Laya, inputted the code and it said to contact them. I then phoned them and they confirmed it wasn't covered.
I then used their chat asking them for the full Laya "Schedule of benefits" (the one that includes all the procedures and codes). I've since had a response from them about that query and they say that the schedule is only available to Consultants! Other insurance companies make this schedule available on their websites. I will at some point make an official complaint to Laya so that I can at a later date follow up with the Ombudsman.
 
@Curlyfella Laya told me that 'cast application' (code 3130) is not covered at all by Laya. It seems so strange that something so simple would not be covered. So, as an example, I asked if I was in the hospital with a broken leg would they not cover the application of a cast. They said that it would most likely be that I would be in a public hospital in the first instance and the cast application would be done via A&E and therefore covered by the A&E charge. They said that if I presented to a private A&E then they would get an itemised bill for my treatment and that the element related to the application of the cast would not be covered.

That is based on their assumption that you had a accident or injury and was admitted to a public hospital.
You could be in the same situation after an elective procedure also - public or private - and therefore no cover for the cast either way......
I would wonder if the other companies do the same?

In summary it is a cop out - and they are putting the onus on the public hospitals which are so fantastic here.......


They said that if I presented to a private A&E then they would get an itemised bill for my treatment and that the element related to the application of the cast would not be covered.

It pretty crazy. in This situation then the patient would not be able to get a cast if they can't pay for it in the private hospital and their care is under the private hospital and they could then have bad/incorrect bone healing from no casting and then they would require
inpatient procedures to break the bone to correct it again requiring a cast and this all costs money........with the chances of good recovery ruined.

But hey they saved money not paying for the cast but will have to cover repeat procedures*
 
@Clamball. That's how I initially found out that the procedure wasn't covered. I logged into Laya, inputted the code and it said to contact them. I then phoned them and they confirmed it wasn't covered.
I then used their chat asking them for the full Laya "Schedule of benefits" (the one that includes all the procedures and codes). I've since had a response from them about that query and they say that the schedule is only available to Consultants! Other insurance companies make this schedule available on their websites. I will at some point make an official complaint to Laya so that I can at a later date follow up with the Ombudsman.

Laya "Schedule of benefits" - is only available to consultants?
Yes there is nothing online from them while the others are fully available.

Making it up as they go along!

Here's the irish life one for example

 
That is based on their assumption that you had a accident or injury and was admitted to a public hospital.
You could be in the same situation after an elective procedure also - public or private - and therefore no cover for the cast either way......
I would wonder if the other companies do the same?

In summary it is a cop out - and they are putting the onus on the public hospitals which are so fantastic here.......


They said that if I presented to a private A&E then they would get an itemised bill for my treatment and that the element related to the application of the cast would not be covered.

It pretty crazy. in This situation then the patient would not be able to get a cast if they can't pay for it in the private hospital and their care is under the private hospital and they could then have bad/incorrect bone healing from no casting and then they would require
inpatient procedures to break the bone to correct it again requiring a cast and this all costs money........with the chances of good recovery ruined.

But hey they saved money not paying for the cast but will have to cover repeat procedures*
It's all pretty frustrating isn't it.
 
Back
Top