I questioned the prevailing rate issue with KBC numerous times and finally when pushed, they put it in writing to me that the prevailing rate was the SVR (in 2006). But they didn't actually mention the rate or give me proof. I feel that I was being fobbed off just to shut me up. I will find that documentation tomorrow and post photos here. Could it be that this is another lie from KBC??
I got them saying "yes they can confirm prevailing rate is variable", also, but no definition or explanation or anything more concrete than them saying yes it was.
Really Wonder, can you elaborate?
@Wonder do you have some insight into this or is it just your view?Hang in there all we are nearly there ,the fspo have kbc in there sights.
@Wonder that is good to hearMy case is at the investigation stage and the fspo have asked the right questions and asked for the right documents of kbc should know more in 20 days .
No dont trust kbc as far as I could throw then .Fspo or the high court for me .Kbc have caused too much pain and hurt to get away with what they have knowing done in my opinion.Wonder had you appealed this before going to FSPO? I was 100% successful
Ya I was through a broker also and advised to fix from the start that seemed to be what they were pushing at the timeInteresting. Huge amount of broker activity in play during this period and doubtful that they invisaged what was down the line .as alluded to many are now gone
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?