Hi can anyone please advise. I had a jointly owned buy to let repossessed 7 years ago. Bank got a summary judgement for 2.2 million in July 2013 against all parties. They subsequently got judgement mortgages on family homes and other jointly owned apartments. I have now received a summons to attend the district court. My question is 1)why would the bank go back to a court and 2) can a bank enforce a judgement mortgage on a buy to let that is mortgaged with another lender, also 3) can they enforce a judgement mortgage on a property where they are the mortgagor but where the property was never given as security against the repossession. Any help would be greatly appreciated.