Scenario: Brother dies intestate and 2 executors are nominated to represent the all 8 siblings/beneficiaries.
All goes well for a while but after 2 years with a final form to sign to get probate, one executor has stated that they're seeking legal advice and refuse to sign till after this is sought. He informs the solicitors that are handling the estate of this. The other executor asks the (same) estate solicitor for advice on how to proceed. The estate solicitor says they must get consent of both to proceed and cannot advise stating that both executors require independent advice, basically washing their hands and saying not our remit.
Obviously this has the potential to blow up but I would have thought that the co-operating exec could at least be advised by the estate solicitor in his capacity ? There are 2 assets to be sold and cannot proceed till probate is got.
I should point out that the brother is regarded as being UK domiciled and is being dealt with in the UK. There is a tax liability outstanding and interest owing since 6 months of death.
All goes well for a while but after 2 years with a final form to sign to get probate, one executor has stated that they're seeking legal advice and refuse to sign till after this is sought. He informs the solicitors that are handling the estate of this. The other executor asks the (same) estate solicitor for advice on how to proceed. The estate solicitor says they must get consent of both to proceed and cannot advise stating that both executors require independent advice, basically washing their hands and saying not our remit.
Obviously this has the potential to blow up but I would have thought that the co-operating exec could at least be advised by the estate solicitor in his capacity ? There are 2 assets to be sold and cannot proceed till probate is got.
I should point out that the brother is regarded as being UK domiciled and is being dealt with in the UK. There is a tax liability outstanding and interest owing since 6 months of death.