At the time I think 75% of properites were owner occupied so volume is relevant here ... If the situation was reversed and the state become reliant on the CGT sales of an investment property market of 75% then there would be a danger of history repeating itself if the state expands its expenditure based on these kind of 'windfall' unpredictable gains... and then the gains dry up.
The below is an excerpt from an DoF document justifying the introduction of property tax... maybe it's the same group now flying a kite for CGT on PPRs... if so, it begs the question were they talking nonsense then or now...
From the Department of Finance Tax Strategy Group:
"An annual property tax provides a reliable and sustainable source of revenue as compared to the transaction taxes on property which characterised Ireland’s recent approach to property taxation. Stamp Duty on property transactions, which is dependent on transaction levels and values, is particularly subject to fluctuations, especially in times of buoyant property prices and markets which characterised the
2003 to 2007 period. Capital Gains Tax and Capital Acquisitions Tax which involve taxing the appreciation of an asset on sale or inheritance are also subject to fluctuations closely related to changes in asset values and the level of transactions in the property market. From 1998 onwards the strong relationship between economic growth and the resultant increase in the taxation yield from property transfers and rising asset values led to an over-reliance on this source of revenue. This over-reliance has led, in turn, to serious difficulties for the Exchequer in the context of the decline in economic activity which particularly impacted on the property market in recent years with an associated sharp decrease in property transfers and values."
Mark Barrett (President, Irish Tax Institute): "We paid the price for being exposed in relation to Capital Gains Tax, Stamp Duty and Transaction Taxes."
[broken link removed]