Even if that goal had been disallowed,we would probably still have lost.
No offence but this is bull**** - why would we probably still have lost - we were every bit as good as France last night and actually created more chances than they did.
Even if that goal had been disallowed,we would probably still have lost.
No offence but this is bull**** - why would we probably still have lost - we were every bit as good as France last night and actually created more chances than they did.
I wouldn't call what Henry did cheating.
Why not though?
One handball - instinctive/deflection/accidental etc - fair enough it happens, but to handle it twice, and the second time to basically use it to control the ball, steadying it so he could tap it in?!?!
I'm not even into football (or any sport) but I can't see how that could ever be considered to be not cheating.
No-one can say who would or would not have gone through last night so to suggest that we probably would have lost anyway is quite frankly ridiculous.
Because it was instinctive. Anyone who has played football has done something similar at some stage. Robbie Keane got done about 5 times last night for hand ball but no-one accuses him of cheating. It was a shocking referee decision.
out of protest against the french, i am never buying a reno clio. And as for that swedish ref! Well, i'm boycotting the mamma mia dvd. Other half will never get me to watch it now.
If anyone thinks that the handball was bad, they should listen to the interview that Ivan Yates had with the referee on Newstalk just before 9.00am this morning. Talk about deliberate insults!:mad:
If anyone thinks that the handball was bad, they should listen to the interview that Ivan Yates had with the referee on Newstalk just before 9.00am this morning. Talk about deliberate insults!:mad: