Some AIB Panel members deciding on cases for AIB, may be perceived appear to be conflicted or are conflicted. Under rules 11.1. 11.2 & 11.3 of Terms of Reference and Tracker Panel Rules
From public information sources, found numerous perceptions of conflicts with previous Relationships and Consultancy work done for AIB , Bank Account relationships of Panel Members via their various activities from Company data sources, Panel Members with AIB shareholdings, Panel Members with AIB / EBS Mortgages, Panel Members with no qualifications in Banking, Property or other relevant areas of specific claims?
Has anybody else checked into the Panels relationships with AIB? Would love to hear as process appears tainted and motivation of Panels questionable?
From public information sources, found numerous perceptions of conflicts with previous Relationships and Consultancy work done for AIB , Bank Account relationships of Panel Members via their various activities from Company data sources, Panel Members with AIB shareholdings, Panel Members with AIB / EBS Mortgages, Panel Members with no qualifications in Banking, Property or other relevant areas of specific claims?
Has anybody else checked into the Panels relationships with AIB? Would love to hear as process appears tainted and motivation of Panels questionable?