Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,773
What should I do?
First of all you can fill in the payment form and get paid the €1,615 without it affecting your right to claim more?
Are there others affected by this?
Yes, around 4,000 AIB customers are getting this letter.
Why did we get it?
There are some slight variations, but the most common case is the following:
You took out a fixed rate mortgage with AIB around 2006.
Your letter of offer contained the following words "At the end of any fixed interest rate period, the customer may choose between a) a further fixed rate b) a variable rate or c) conversion to a tracker at the bank's then prevailing rate"
When your fixed rate ended in 2009, AIB did not offer you a tracker.
They should have done so.
But they are offering me a tracker now at 3.32% - that is higher than my current mortgage rate
AIB argue that while they did not have a prevailing rate back in 2009, if they had had one, it would have been 3.32%
But I thought tracker rates were about 1%?
AIB stopped offering trackers to new customers in October 2008 and the last rate they offered was 1.25%.
The average rate on their tracker mortgage book is probably less than 1%.
So why is the 1.25% not the "prevailing rate"?
Because that is what AIB says it would have been.
They set this rate in 2013 - 5 years after the event.
I have read about other customers getting €20,000 and €30,000 in compensation. Why am I not getting that?
AIB is arguing that if they had offered you a tracker back then and if you had taken it, you would have had higher repayments than the actual repayments on the variable rate or the fixed rate you were on.
Therefore according to AIB "you did not suffer any financial detriment".
Should I accept the 3.32% rate now?
No you shouldn't. It is higher than the other variable rates on offer from AIB.
Can I challenge this 3.32% rate and get a rate closer to 1%?
1) You can appeal to the Independent Appeals Panel
If they reject your appeal, you can either
Go to the Financial Services Ombudsman
or
Take legal action.
If you go to the Financial Services Ombudsman and are unsuccessful, you can't then go to the High Court. (In theory, you can. In practice, you can't.)
So what should I do?
There is strength in numbers. One person needs to take a case to the High Court. If the High Court upholds that case, then the others can take cases of their own as the ruling of the High Court would set a precedent.
User Bungaro on Askaboutmoney has set up a group to take such a case.
Don't spend your €1,615. Send it to the group to fund the legal action. If the action is successful, you should get your money back. You should also get a cheap tracker backdated to when you came off the fixed rate. You should also get compensation for the distress caused by being overcharged.
If you are a user on Askaboutmoney, you can message him via
Padraic Kissane may be getting involved as well
Padraic has focused on other groups in the past and didn't mention the AIB Group when he made presentations to the Oireachtas Finance Committee. But he is taking action now. [broken link removed]
Why is the Central Bank forcing AIB to put these customers on a fair tracker rate?
The Central Bank is well aware of this issue.
Until the Central Bank got involved, AIB was rejecting all claims from these customers on the grounds that they were "not impacted".
At least the Central Bank encouraged AIB to pay everyone €1,615. It is not just the money. This also brings them within the Independent Appeals Panel system and within the Ombudsman system.
Should I see a solicitor or financial advisor?
No. This must not be fought on a case by case basis. Those affected must group together and take a test case.
How much time do I have?
You have one year from the time you received the letter to appeal. So keep an eye on this forum and don't do anything yet apart from filling in the form to claim the €1,650
First of all you can fill in the payment form and get paid the €1,615 without it affecting your right to claim more?
Are there others affected by this?
Yes, around 4,000 AIB customers are getting this letter.
Why did we get it?
There are some slight variations, but the most common case is the following:
You took out a fixed rate mortgage with AIB around 2006.
Your letter of offer contained the following words "At the end of any fixed interest rate period, the customer may choose between a) a further fixed rate b) a variable rate or c) conversion to a tracker at the bank's then prevailing rate"
When your fixed rate ended in 2009, AIB did not offer you a tracker.
They should have done so.
But they are offering me a tracker now at 3.32% - that is higher than my current mortgage rate
AIB argue that while they did not have a prevailing rate back in 2009, if they had had one, it would have been 3.32%
But I thought tracker rates were about 1%?
AIB stopped offering trackers to new customers in October 2008 and the last rate they offered was 1.25%.
The average rate on their tracker mortgage book is probably less than 1%.
So why is the 1.25% not the "prevailing rate"?
Because that is what AIB says it would have been.
They set this rate in 2013 - 5 years after the event.
I have read about other customers getting €20,000 and €30,000 in compensation. Why am I not getting that?
AIB is arguing that if they had offered you a tracker back then and if you had taken it, you would have had higher repayments than the actual repayments on the variable rate or the fixed rate you were on.
Therefore according to AIB "you did not suffer any financial detriment".
Should I accept the 3.32% rate now?
No you shouldn't. It is higher than the other variable rates on offer from AIB.
Can I challenge this 3.32% rate and get a rate closer to 1%?
1) You can appeal to the Independent Appeals Panel
If they reject your appeal, you can either
Go to the Financial Services Ombudsman
or
Take legal action.
If you go to the Financial Services Ombudsman and are unsuccessful, you can't then go to the High Court. (In theory, you can. In practice, you can't.)
So what should I do?
There is strength in numbers. One person needs to take a case to the High Court. If the High Court upholds that case, then the others can take cases of their own as the ruling of the High Court would set a precedent.
User Bungaro on Askaboutmoney has set up a group to take such a case.
Don't spend your €1,615. Send it to the group to fund the legal action. If the action is successful, you should get your money back. You should also get a cheap tracker backdated to when you came off the fixed rate. You should also get compensation for the distress caused by being overcharged.
If you are a user on Askaboutmoney, you can message him via
Padraic Kissane may be getting involved as well
Padraic has focused on other groups in the past and didn't mention the AIB Group when he made presentations to the Oireachtas Finance Committee. But he is taking action now. [broken link removed]
Why is the Central Bank forcing AIB to put these customers on a fair tracker rate?
The Central Bank is well aware of this issue.
Until the Central Bank got involved, AIB was rejecting all claims from these customers on the grounds that they were "not impacted".
At least the Central Bank encouraged AIB to pay everyone €1,615. It is not just the money. This also brings them within the Independent Appeals Panel system and within the Ombudsman system.
Should I see a solicitor or financial advisor?
No. This must not be fought on a case by case basis. Those affected must group together and take a test case.
How much time do I have?
You have one year from the time you received the letter to appeal. So keep an eye on this forum and don't do anything yet apart from filling in the form to claim the €1,650
Last edited: