You only have one vote, but it is transferable. If you vote through the card you will ensure you have a say in who is elected. I vote in reverse order so, as there are 11 candidates in my constituency, I will put 11 beside the candidate I dislike the most and work backwards to my No. 1. If your preference is eliminated then your next preference will come into play; also if your preference is for someone already elected then there's a chance that your vote will be part of their surplus and thus your next preference may come into play.Any Advise on using PR system?
Don't think so. You can try to maximise the longevity of your vote by starting with the least likely candidate and working through to the most likely so your preferences will be counted as each one is eliminated (well it's more complicated than that but that is the gist of it), I suspect that only Muppet's like Count Von Count would adopt that strategy.That doesn't maximise (the effectiveness of) your vote . . I think there are strategies for ensuring your vote is maximised . .
I vote in reverse order so, as there are 11 candidates in my constituency, I will put 11 beside the candidate I dislike the most and work backwards to my No. 1.
Not possible. I tell anyone that calls that I vote for everyone, and I do.Why go all the way down the list? If your #11 is really someone you don't want elected, then in theory your putting them on the list, even as a #11, might just get them over the line.
Any use?How are surpluses/eliminated divided? Do they actually count all the next preferences and divide them %wise. Or numberswise?
But there are lots of other ways that a vote could be rendered spoiled even if you vote all the way down. I would assume that such vote tampering is extremely rare.
I also tend to vote all the way down the list giving everybody a preference.
Perhaps this is the polling equivalent of natural selection and survival of the fittest?I would think voting all the way down increases the chance of a voter error and hence the chance of spoiling your vote?
Only those who can count to double digits should be given the vote?Perhaps this is the polling equivalent of natural selection and survival of the fittest?
True enough, but I suppose it is one of the easier ways of spoiling a vote.
I do know pople who will make sure Sinn Fein get the last preference, so this would necessitate votin g all the way down.
That's the bit I don't get: by giving them any preference surely there's a very, very small chance your vote could be used to elect them.
If you don't give them any preference, there's no way your vote can ever be used to elect them.
That doesn't maximise (the effectiveness of) your vote.
For example, if you live in Bertie's constituency, is there any point in giving him a #2 or #3 when you know he'll be elected on the 1st count?
Or am I wrong?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?