Housing for All : Where are we going to get 27,500 extra construction workers?

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
52,099
From Executive Summary (PDF page 10)

The pathway to more houses requires more people to build them.
An estimated 40,000 workers are involved in delivering 20,000 homes per annum.
This will need to increase by a further 27,500 workers to hit the target of 33,000 homes per annum.
It will need to rise further again to eliminate the existing housing stock deficit.
This will happen through the attraction and retention of those with the necessary pre-existing
skills and the provision of new training opportunities for those interested in a career in the construction sector.
The industry will be supported in returning existing workers to full employment and proactive engagement
with international labour where supply is unavailable locally.
We will also further ramp up education and training opportunities, including commitments regarding programmes
and apprenticeships and delivery of new courses.
 
3.5 Increase Labour and Sectoral Capacity

Delivering on the ambition set out in Housing for All will require a vibrant and innovative construction sector that supports the development of its existing workforce, including through lifelong learning, and presents an attractive and sustainable career for those preparing to enter the labour force.

The Building Innovation Report15 undertaken by the Construction Sector Group identifies a series of high impact actions to be undertaken to increase innovation and output in the sector in order to deliver the economic and social infrastructure that this country needs. More than ever, Ireland needs a competitive, dynamic, and sustainable construction sector that can deliver high quality physical infrastructure for all our citizens.

Following the major reversals associated with the financial crisis, the industry experienced a steady and determined improvement between 2014 and 2019. Construction sector employment and investment picked up over this period,
with employment growing from just over 100,000 whole time equivalent workers in 2014, to almost 150,000 at the end of 2019. The Covid pandemic has since intervened and caused major disruption to the sector. A critical
issue for the sector is to seek to re- establish the workforce gains made pre-pandemic to the greatest extent possible, as there are significant time- lags in providing the necessary skills to prospective employees new to the sector. For example, training of a craft apprentice can take up to four years, while architecture courses are five years’ duration, followed by two years in professional practice to achieve professional registration.

To deliver an average of 33,000 houses and apartments (and beyond) will require an expansion of the current
workforce. This will happen through the attraction and retention of those with the necessary pre-existing skills and the provision of new training opportunities for those interested in a career in the construction sector. This will require a plan to support the industry in returning existing workers to full employment and proactive engagement with international labour where supply
is unavailable locally. It will also require further ramp-up in education and training opportunities, including commitment regarding programmes and apprenticeships and delivery of new courses.

The Action Plan on Apprenticeship 2021-25 contains an ambitious commitment to increase apprenticeship registrations to 10,000 per annum, almost double the 2020 intake. There are now 60 different apprenticeship
types (with a further 18 in development) and they extend well beyond the construction sector or traditional craft trades. Working with employers in the construction sector to expand their employment of apprentices will be critical to a medium term, sustainable approach to the future availability of necessary skills.

The 2020 Building Future Skills Report16 sets out Ireland’s built environment skills demand until 2030; 50 percent of the key roles are mapped to apprentice trades. However, it is intended that the forecasts in this report will be revised to take account of two forthcoming studies commissioned by the Expert Group on Future Skills Needs;

• Labour Demand Estimates for Ireland’s National Housing Targets, 2021-2030, and

• Skills to Enable the Low Carbon Economy to 2030.

The forthcoming Labour Demand Estimates for Ireland’s National Housing Targets, 2021-2030 Report estimates that total labour demand from housing construction will need to rise from approximately 40,000 full-time equivalent workers at present, to 67,500 workers by the middle of the decade, to achieve an annual average of 33,000 homes over the decade.

As the backlog of housing output has built up, a further increase, possibly up to 80,000 workers may be necessary. The Report also estimates the labour demand across the key occupations for the Built Environment, from architects
to construction operatives. For example, it is suggested that approximately 2,500 additional carpenters will need to be recruited or trained in total in order to reach the target of 33,000 homes per annum.

The forthcoming report on the Skills to Enable the Low Carbon Economy to 2030 will also identify further workforce requirements in relation to the Climate Action Plan’s retrofit targets and the construction of renewable energy projects.

Building Future Skills forecasts will be revised to take account of the subsequent forecasts to achieve housing targets and the transition to a low carbon economy. Meanwhile education and training output will be aligned with these requirements.

The DFHERIS and its agency, Solas, will deliver an integrated education and training sector response to these skills forecasts, in particular through the forthcoming Solas ‘Strategy for Construction Services’. The DETE will also make any necessary changes in the employment permit system in order to increase the number of construction skilled workers required to expand the supply of housing.

In addition to the scale of labour across the range of activities associated with delivering housing, support services for professionals including insurance, etc., will need to be considered to ensure adequate capacity.

All of the above initiatives to address the supply of skills are predicated on employers and the construction industry generally continuing to review the attractiveness of its career offering to current and prospective employees, promoting careers in the construction sector and partnering with education and training providers to provide upskilling and reskilling through professional bodies, Skillnet Ireland, apprenticeships and further and higher education and training providers.

The above will be complemented by the actions to be delivered to drive economic sustainability and reduce construction costs over the longer term, detailed in Chapter Five, section 5.3.1.
 
Last edited:
This all seems like wishful thinking to me?

It is important to recognise the reality because a plan based on unreality has no chance of success.

We will have to make choices with the limited supply of construction workers available.

Do we build new houses or supply broadband to everyone in the country?
Do we build new houses or retrofit old houses for energy purposes?
Do we build hospitals or new houses?

Tough choices have to be made.
 
Last edited:
The construction industry have raised this very point continuously, that the workers do not exist anywhere now to build these houses, it's a global phenomenon, it's all over Europe and the US and everyone seems to want to build more houses at the same time.
The construction workforce we had are gone to uk Canada and Australia,
"I'm over here, oh mother dear, and I'm never coming back"
Many more left to work in other jobs also not returning.
It's not a money issue but a lifestyle one, it's just not a desirable career for young guys now, maybe a radical overhaul of work practices to make it more appealing, why should flexible working hours only apply to office workers.
With all the new flexibility and WFH practices in place it has made working in construction even for skilled engineers alot less desirable, the unintended consequences are coming home to roost
 
Attracting new construction workers will not be easy.

Where will a new carpenter from Poland live?

RTE yesterday interviewed construction workers in Sydney and asked them what would it take to come home.

They were not enthusiastic.
  • They won't be able to find somewhere to rent.
  • The banks will not give them a mortgage.
  • The car insurance will be exorbitant.

But primarily they were enjoying the craic and very high wages in Sydney.

They could come home for the construction boom in Ireland only to find themselves discarded after three or four years in the next construction bust.

Brendan
 
It's not a money issue but a lifestyle one, it's just not a desirable career for young guys now, maybe a radical overhaul of work practices to make it more appealing, why should flexible working hours only apply to office workers.
100% agree re flexible work practices; we also need to recognise that its time to take steps to move the construction industry towards more diversity.
 
Throwing €4 billion a year at the industry hoping that more houses will be built, will just push up prices if the workers are not there.

I don't know the solution. But this seems to me to be the biggest constraint.

I think it's planned that the local authorities would build new houses with direct labour. It's hard to see them competing with the private companies.

Brendan
 
100% agree re flexible work practices; we also need to recognise that its time to take steps to move the construction industry towards more diversity.
I doubt the industry itself is discriminatory, in fact generally it is one of the easiest jobs to get if you are an immigrant, that's why the Irish were traditionally over represented in construction from London to new York even during the old days when there was a lot of discrimination in other jobs.
However maybe the "macho" culture etc is a factor alright.
However the antiquated working practices like having to be on site very early in the morning, why can't you chose to start at 10am and work to 6pm for example ?
Also the "builders holidays" where everyone has to take 2 weeks holidays at same time in August
 
doubt the industry itself is discriminatory
I would disagree, diversity encompasses more than nationality.

A so-called "macho culture" is in itself a form of discrimination.

100% agree re work practices and flexibility.
 
If I get a job in Saudi, I will be offered accommodation with the job.

I think we might need to do that here to attract people here to build houses.

So maybe the first step should be to set aside some of the housing under the control of the local authorities for immigrant construction workers. It takes the local authorities months to turn around a vacant home for a new letting. How about allocating these to immigrant construction workers for as long as they are working in the industry. And allocate them in their current condition. As they are construction workers they can fix them up themselves.

Then encourage the banks to relax some of their lending criteria for people working in construction. They would not need to be working a full year. Apprenticeships could be facilitated.

Brendan
 
Where I work we have guys who are qualified plumbers, plasterers and carpenters. They got jobs here after the last crash. They money is about the same but they work indoors, they don't have to travel all over the city or country, they won't get killed or injured, they can take holidays whenever they want, they work in the same place with the same people every day and they will be able to stay in the same sector until they retire. Construction is hard and often unpleasant and the career can be short.

A major issue attracting people into the sector is that there's a big problem with educational snobbery in this country. People would rather their children went to college and worked in an office. If your middle-class child does an apprenticeship then they are thick and you're a bad parent. It doesn't matter that they could earn more and develop into different roles, they get their hands dirty and that's to be looked down on. The result is that the calibre of the Irish born people working in construction can be lower than it should be. Once they are in SOLAS/FAS the standard of the training within the Trade Schools is low (at best) and way out of date. That's why the eastern European guys are generally much better.

There's been multiple threads on the issue of how we build houses and the dysfunctionality of the sector, no point in re-hashing it here.
We are where we are and it's a really bad place to start if we want to fix the problem. It's very hard to unpick 40 years of cronyism, lobbying and gross ineptitude.
 
People would rather their children went to college and worked in an office

but they work indoors, they don't have to travel all over the city or country, they won't get killed or injured, they can take holidays whenever they want, they work in the same place with the same people every day and they will be able to stay in the same sector until they retire
hm... perhaps item 1 is linked to item 2?
 
Should we not be targetting the European migrant workforce in the UK to attract them over here?

Another key issue, how do we ensure the quality of what we build is up to scratch as this will bring out all the chancers going. We don't need another Mica scandal in 2031.

I do recall passing an apartment block in South Dublin in the Celtic Tiger era. I'm far from a building expert but even I could see it was shoddy and plaster covered a multiple of sins
 
hm... perhaps item 1 is linked to item 2?
Partially but it's mainly down to snobbery.
Someone with a degree in Greek and Roman studies will probably earn less than an electrician (unless they end up running the Central Bank) but Mommy will have a photo of them in their robe and hat to show the neighbours.
 
Mommy will have a photo of them in their robe
And Daddy doesn't have the same photo?

In any event, I wouldn't encourage anyone into trades, for the very reasons cited here.

Reform the work practices, improve the culture, benefits etc., then it might be a better long term career.
 
All the more reason to concentrate on identifying vacant and underused dwellings and getting them into use, a
cant see how this plan will get off the ground to any practical extent without an influx of labour,

at least with a lack of workers there is less chance of substandard houses being built to shoddy standards at inflated prices.

There was some talk of how people will afford rents when retired and the overlooked issue of people, very many of them into the future having no discretionary spending power as everything going towards mortgage repayments....
 
If I get a job in Saudi, I will be offered accommodation with the job.

I think we might need to do that here to attract people here to build houses.

So maybe the first step should be to set aside some of the housing under the control of the local authorities for immigrant construction workers. It takes the local authorities months to turn around a vacant home for a new letting. How about allocating these to immigrant construction workers for as long as they are working in the industry. And allocate them in their current condition. As they are construction workers they can fix them up themselves.

Then encourage the banks to relax some of their lending criteria for people working in construction. They would not need to be working a full year. Apprenticeships could be facilitated.

Brendan

You could be sharing your Accommodation with 15-30 other migrant workers in a lot of cases in the desert
 
Back
Top