felixthecat
Registered User
- Messages
- 3
Hello, I would appreciate an opinion please. I have read all the threads on this topic and I am a little confused. I see Brendan Burgess specifically addressed the question I am going to ask some months ago and I wonder has the situation changed subsequently as some people have been reinstated with the same terms.
I took a mortgage with UB in 2006. Fixed in 2007 for two years. When the fixed term expired UB offered another fixed or flexible variable mortgage or if I did not select either of those options I automatically went onto the SVR. I did not select so I was placed on SVR and 8 months later fixed again until end of this year.
Facts briefly are:
Loan agreement states that I was on a "U First Flex - LTV less than 60%". Rate of 3.85% - no mention of tracker but thankfully two emails sent with the loan offer states that it was a ECB tracker with a .85 margin. There is NO reference to the tracker being for the life time of the mortgage. We had to open an U First account to avail of this special rate - ECB plus margin of .85% at a cost of 9 euro a month.
The fixed agreement states that at the end of the fixed we would be offered what ever is available at the time. If no option was selected we would revert to the "Banks Home Loan rate".
I see Brendan said that the Ombudsman normally sides with the bank when the latter is stated? Is that still the case?
We also have an email from an advisor in UB stating that it would be "prudent to fix at this time" with no warning whatsoever of losing the tracker.
I have contacted Kissane and one other QFA to see if we have a case but they seem to be busy as we got no response - or should I read that as we have no case??
I took a mortgage with UB in 2006. Fixed in 2007 for two years. When the fixed term expired UB offered another fixed or flexible variable mortgage or if I did not select either of those options I automatically went onto the SVR. I did not select so I was placed on SVR and 8 months later fixed again until end of this year.
Facts briefly are:
Loan agreement states that I was on a "U First Flex - LTV less than 60%". Rate of 3.85% - no mention of tracker but thankfully two emails sent with the loan offer states that it was a ECB tracker with a .85 margin. There is NO reference to the tracker being for the life time of the mortgage. We had to open an U First account to avail of this special rate - ECB plus margin of .85% at a cost of 9 euro a month.
The fixed agreement states that at the end of the fixed we would be offered what ever is available at the time. If no option was selected we would revert to the "Banks Home Loan rate".
I see Brendan said that the Ombudsman normally sides with the bank when the latter is stated? Is that still the case?
We also have an email from an advisor in UB stating that it would be "prudent to fix at this time" with no warning whatsoever of losing the tracker.
I have contacted Kissane and one other QFA to see if we have a case but they seem to be busy as we got no response - or should I read that as we have no case??
Last edited: