I used mine (5g) for a while and found I was throttled at about 100G in a month. Their Fair usage states 80G but I managed a bit further. I only tried it for about 2 months though.
I guess that the Eir network is better than the 3 network in your area so? GoMo use Eir while 48 use 3.
Even on 48 with unlimited/no fair usage cap 4G/5G data there have been several anecdotal reports of throttling when "a lot" of data has been used in a month (often in a 4G/5G router). But nothing definitive from 48 on this...
Yes and checking the ComReg website seems to confirm that also. I stuck with 48 for the last five years as the €7.99 price was just such a good deal but I felt that despite the extra outlay I had to make a change in the end as I was starting to miss some important phone calls due to the poorer signal.
I must have just been lucky so far. Maybe I'll look to re-active that Sky Mobile SIM at some stage in the future as at least it was advertised as truly unlimited data. There doesn't seem to be any market whatsoever in the Republic for a Data-only SIM such as the likes of SMARTY in the UK. I had looked at the mobile broadband package from Eir but it was simply too expensive and keeps going up in price every year.
Sadly the Three coverage in my area is poor.
If you have a 5G device then you'll also benefit from 5G connectivity on the GoMo €12.99 package whereas 48's €7.99 plan only offered 4G so that might also help?
Weirdly, according to ComReg, Clear Mobile doesn't appear to have 5G coverage in my area despite Vodafone having coverage.
The 48 €7.99 plan is a legacy one that isn't available to new users to sign up to. Also no 5G for those who need/prefer it and call/text/data allowances are capped. Although it suits my adult son fine.
Could this be a mistake by the ComReg coverage checker or would there be a genuine reason for this to be the case?