FT article: Annuities deserve a fresh look

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
52,048


The analysis confirms that at age 60 the optimal strategy for the individual is likely to be to enter drawdown. This would generate a 10 per cent higher satisfaction score than an annuity, chiefly because the individual stays invested for longer.

But, crucially, there is a crossover point at which an annuity becomes more attractive. Based on the assumptions we have made about this individual’s attitudes and goals, the crossover point is around age 67. Beyond this age, an annuity becomes progressively more attractive. mainly because the removal of longevity risk becomes increasingly more appealing.
...

One crucial driver of our results is the fact that life expectancy becomes proportionately more uncertain as you get older, and hence the certainty of an annuity becomes more valuable with age. To illustrate this point, consider a man aged 60. His life expectancy is around 26 years, so on average he should live to 86. When managing his retirement pot in drawdown what matters is not just spreading that pot over 26 years but also planning for what happens if he lives much longer. However, at 60 he can essentially forget about the “risk” of living double the average lifespan, as this would mean living to the age of 112. Now consider a man aged 80. His average life expectancy is just over eight years, so he might plan to make his money last to age 88. But in this case it is not inconceivable that he could live twice as long as expected — to age 96. Indeed, the Office for National Statistics suggests that around one in nine men aged 80 will live to 96, so this is a risk he cannot ignore.
 
Beyond this age, an annuity becomes progressively more attractive. mainly because the removal of longevity risk becomes increasingly more appealing.

But risk of adverse selection increases as health outcomes get more dispersed with age. I'd say 99% of 60 year olds are ambulatory. I'd say only 95% of 80 year olds are.


My guess is the only 80 year old who'll want to buy an annuity is one you won't want to sell one to!

I'm sure actuaries can price all this stuff.


I've always though that a small annuity at a relatively young age is a good way of hedging against living to your 90s and/or a sequence of bad equity returns.

I can't see how ex ante waiting til a certain age is a good strategy.
 
Last edited:
No, I think adverse selection certainly works here - those who believe (rightly or wrongly) that they will outlive their expected age, will want to buy an annuity, those who don't wont
 
Back
Top