Key Post Forecasting Mortgage Arrears and Repossessions

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
52,100
Summary
While it is hard to forecast mortgage arrears, the most likely outcome is a gradual and small increase from the present level.
However, if the Irish state defaults or leaves the euro, many more would be unable to pay their mortgage.
We should face up to the fact that around 10,000 people would be better off surrendering their homes as they have no hope of repaying their mortgage, ever.

The current level of arrears on home loans ( excludes investment properties)
As of 31 March 2011 per [broken link removed]
|31 March 2010|31 March 2011
Number of mortgages in arrears over 90 days| 21,187|49,602
Number of mortgages restructured and not in arrears|n/a|39,662
Total restructured or in arrears||89,264
Total number of mortgages|791,047|782,429
% in arrears over 90 days|2.7%|6.3%
% in arrears or restructured||11.5%
% paying according to the original agreement|88.5%
Many of those who are in arrears are paying something towards their mortgage. The media sometimes reports that 6.3% of people have made no payment on their mortgage in over 90 days. This is not correct. Some of them are paying nothing, but most are actually paying something.

We don’t know how many are in arrears between 0 and 90 days. I would guess that it is a further 5% or so. In normal times, the level of arrears between 0 and 90 days is not hugely relevant as people have temporary problems and usually sort them out quickly. Given that most people going into early arrears these days, would probably move into the 90+ days arrears eventually, this information would be very useful.


Why is the level so low?

Given the following factors, one would expect much higher arrears levels:

  • Reckless lending by the mortgage providers
    • 100% mortgages
    • interest only mortgages
    • lending up to 9 times a person’s salary
  • huge prices paid for houses during the boom and consequently huge mortgages
  • Around 200,000 borrowers in negative equity
  • 14% unemployment
  • major cuts in salaries in both the private sector and the public sector
  • major increases in income taxes



The following factors are keeping the level of arrears low

  • Very low interest rates
  • Many people built up savings during the good years or paid off some of their mortgage
  • Comparatively high salary levels in Ireland
  • Very high redundancy payments
  • Comparatively high social welfare rates in Ireland
  • Most of the houses bought at the boom were bought with cheap trackers so the repayments are very low
  • Generous Mortgage Interest Supplement which probably keeps around 18,000 people out of arrears but in the rescheduled group.
  • Unemployment is probably lower among those with mortgages
  • Mainstream Irish lenders did not give sub-prime loans

At the peak of the market, the ECB rate was between 3% and 4%. Borrowers were stress tested for rises of up to 2%. So, in theory, someone who borrowed €300,000 in 2006 should be able to sustain a rise in ECB rates up to around 6%. The ECB rate is currently 1.25% although this is expected to rise to 2% by the end of 2011.

Some single people who bought houses at the top of the market are able to rent out their houses as the rental market is strong in many parts of Ireland.

The biggest factor in arrears levels is the level of unemployment
If a person has a job, they can usually pay their mortgage. They may struggle. They may have to reschedule. They may not be able to withstand the full interest rate rises when they come, but most will pay some or all of their mortgage.

If a person loses their job, they typically have some savings and may get a lump-sum redundancy payment. They can usually pay their mortgage for around 6 months. After their savings run out, they can’t pay the €1,100 monthly repayment. In 18,000 cases, the state is paying most of the interest through MIS. If they don’t qualify for MIS, they will fall into arrears.

So to predict the level of arrears accurately, one has to first predict unemployment accurately. The consensus view seems to be that unemployment has peaked but will stay high for some time before falling. If that is so, then the level of arrears will stay around the same as it is now.

Other factors are important, but less important than unemployment

  • Interest rates
  • Salary levels
  • Tax rates

Someone who borrowed €300,000 on a 30 year mortgage in 2006 at ECB + 1% has repayments today of around €1,100 per month. If the rate they pay increases to 5%( ECB + 1%), their repayments will rise to €1,600 per month. If they are sill working, they will still be able to pay the €1,100, so they may fall into arrears but they will still be paying most of their mortgage. In practice, they will either cut down elsewhere and maintain the increased repayment, or else they will reschedule the mortgage and pay it off over a longer time period.

If they are not working, they can’t pay the mortgage, even if the rate is only 2.25%.


Borrower behaviour and the impact of negative equity
Back in November, Morgan Kelly predicted massive strategic default
Between negotiated repayment reductions and defaults, at least 100,000 mortgages (one in eight) are already under water, and things have barely started.

Banks have been relying on two dams to block the torrent of defaults – house prices and social stigma – but both have started to crumble alarmingly.

The perception growing among borrowers is that while they played by the rules, the banks certainly did not, cynically persuading them into mortgages that they had no hope of affording. Facing a choice between obligations to the banks and to their families – mortgage or food – growing numbers are choosing the latter.

In the last year, America has seen a rising number of “strategic defaults”. People choose to stop repaying their mortgages, realising they can live rent-free in their house for several years before eviction, and then rent a better house for less than the interest on their current mortgage. …

If one family defaults on its mortgage, they are pariahs: if 200,000 default they are a powerful political constituency. There is no shame in admitting that you too were mauled by the Celtic Tiger after being conned into taking out an unaffordable mortgage, when everyone around you is admitting the same.
There is little evidence of this as yet. There will always be some people who will want to escape paying their mortgage. But most people can still pay their mortgage and they continue to do so. Most people still value their good credit record and their job.

If the bankruptcy legislation is changed so that those in serious negative equity can effectively hand back their keys, then we may well see a change in borrower behaviour. To go bankrupt, a borrower would have to be unemployed and in serious negative equity. Some will quit their jobs if they think that they can escape negative equity, but not many. The risk that hundreds of thousands might strategically default should not stop us amending the legislation for the many people who genuinely have unsustainable mortgages and need a fresh start.

200,000 borrowers are in negative equity, but only 6% of all mortgages are in arrears. So, assuming that a higher proportion of those in negative equity are in arrears, it's probably still only around 20,000 who are in negative equity and who are in arrears. We tend to think that becasuse house prices have fallen 50%, people have 200% loans to value. In practice, most people did not get 100% mortgages, most did not buy at the top of the market, and many have paid off some capital.


The biggest threat is state default and massive economic disruption
If the bailout works and Ireland continues to function, then the level of arrears may rise gradually, but it won’t come anywhere close to the levels predicted by the stress tests.

We live in a high salary, high welfare, low tax state. This is funded by borrowing from the Troika. As long as we can continue borrowing, most people will be well paid and will be able to pay their mortgages. The state can afford to pay MIS to those who have lost their jobs.

If the state defaults, all bets are off. If we are no longer able to borrow, we will no longer be able to pay the public servants and mortgage arrears would skyrocket. If we choose to cut public service pay by 30% and increase taxation to avoid default, then arrears would also rise significantly, but not to the same extent.

I don’t know what would happen if the euro collapses or if Ireland leaves the euro. It is likely that people’s savings in Irish banks would be significantly devalued. If that is correct, then so would people’s mortgages.

My forecast for arrears at the end of 2012
|Current|Expected |Pessimistic| if Ireland defaults
Arrears| 50,000|60,000|80,000|?
Rescheduled|40,000|50,000|80,000|?
 
Predicting repossessions

Repossession data for all lenders - mainstream and sub-prime
|Q12010|Q2 2010|Q3 2010|Q4 2010|2010 total|Q1 2011
Repossessed on foot of court order|26|20|22|34|102|49
Surrendered or abandoned|65|66|59|72|262|91
Total|||||364|
I am informed by the Irish Banking Federation that 70 houses were repossessed by their members in 2010 on foot of a court order.
If you have a loan from one of the main banks, your chances of having your home repossessed against your will in 2010 was 1 chance in 10,000

The recommendations of the Expert Group on Mortgage Arrears came up with a suite of measures to maximise the chances of people in arrears to get back on track.

But the government should not be attempting to keep everyone in their family home. Some loans are clearly unsustainable. They probably should never have been given the loan in the first place. They would be better off agreeing with their bank to sell the house and come to some arrangement over the shortfall.

I would guess that of the 50,000 currently in arrears, around 20% must be unsustainable. That is around 10,000 repossessions or voluntary surrenders. We should face up to this and develop a policy to deal with it.
 
Back
Top