B
Beamish
Guest
Hi. I am just wondering if somebody can tell me if these fees are excessive.
When my cousin died a few years ago, we found that she was the holder of a bogus non - resident account and hence there was going to be an issue with respect to underdeclaration of Income tax.
My sister was the executor and she got her accountant to handle Revenue. When my sister got my cousins previous returns to Revenue we discovered that my cousin had not declared any deposit interest earned in the previous 25 years.
As a result, the accountant had to calculate tax due, together with interest and penalties for this 25 year period.
We gave the accountant copies of my cousin's returns over this period and we gave her the relevant bank statements. This is basically all the accountant needed to calculate the tax liability in this case.
I am not exaggerating, but calculating the tax due together with interest and penalties is just a few pages work and I could easily have done it myself in an afternoon following the instructions on the Revenue website.
Basically, the accountant:
(1) Wrote to the solicitor a few times.
(2) Wrote to Revenue a few times
(3) Prepared and submitted a summary of revised calculations for the previous 25 years.
The accountant's fees were calculated on the basis that 25 years of tax returns were prepared at approx. E520 per year inc. VAT, which came to approx. E13,000!
E13,000 seems like a ludicrous amount of money to me, seeing as my own self assesment tax returns are much more complicated, involve a lot more work and take a lot more time. My own yearly returns cost around E550.
My point is this; it's not as though the accountant had to trawl through 25 years of invoices, cheques and receipts in order to prepare & submit 25 individual revised profiles which were detailed & complete - she simply had to submit a summary of her calculations based on:
(a) My cousin's previous returns to Revenue
(b) The relevant bank statements
I know some of you are thinking that the accountant probably saved us money by using her expertise to reduce our tax bill, and this is what we were paying her for. This, however, is not the case; I came up with exactly the same set of figures myself when I followed the Revenue guidelines.
I also know the fact that I could have sorted this out myself isn't the point; we hired a professional to do this and & it's only fair that she should get a fair wage.
I don't mind paying somebody a fair wage for a fair days work, but the fees charged in this case were totally disproportional to the work done.
Then again, this may be a standard method of calculating fees in such cases; I just don't know.
I'd appreciate it if somebody could tell me if these fees are excessive with respect to an underdeclaration of income tax case. If so, is there a means to complain complain about excessive fees to some governing body?
I would really appreciate some advice on this.
Cheers
When my cousin died a few years ago, we found that she was the holder of a bogus non - resident account and hence there was going to be an issue with respect to underdeclaration of Income tax.
My sister was the executor and she got her accountant to handle Revenue. When my sister got my cousins previous returns to Revenue we discovered that my cousin had not declared any deposit interest earned in the previous 25 years.
As a result, the accountant had to calculate tax due, together with interest and penalties for this 25 year period.
We gave the accountant copies of my cousin's returns over this period and we gave her the relevant bank statements. This is basically all the accountant needed to calculate the tax liability in this case.
I am not exaggerating, but calculating the tax due together with interest and penalties is just a few pages work and I could easily have done it myself in an afternoon following the instructions on the Revenue website.
Basically, the accountant:
(1) Wrote to the solicitor a few times.
(2) Wrote to Revenue a few times
(3) Prepared and submitted a summary of revised calculations for the previous 25 years.
The accountant's fees were calculated on the basis that 25 years of tax returns were prepared at approx. E520 per year inc. VAT, which came to approx. E13,000!
E13,000 seems like a ludicrous amount of money to me, seeing as my own self assesment tax returns are much more complicated, involve a lot more work and take a lot more time. My own yearly returns cost around E550.
My point is this; it's not as though the accountant had to trawl through 25 years of invoices, cheques and receipts in order to prepare & submit 25 individual revised profiles which were detailed & complete - she simply had to submit a summary of her calculations based on:
(a) My cousin's previous returns to Revenue
(b) The relevant bank statements
I know some of you are thinking that the accountant probably saved us money by using her expertise to reduce our tax bill, and this is what we were paying her for. This, however, is not the case; I came up with exactly the same set of figures myself when I followed the Revenue guidelines.
I also know the fact that I could have sorted this out myself isn't the point; we hired a professional to do this and & it's only fair that she should get a fair wage.
I don't mind paying somebody a fair wage for a fair days work, but the fees charged in this case were totally disproportional to the work done.
Then again, this may be a standard method of calculating fees in such cases; I just don't know.
I'd appreciate it if somebody could tell me if these fees are excessive with respect to an underdeclaration of income tax case. If so, is there a means to complain complain about excessive fees to some governing body?
I would really appreciate some advice on this.
Cheers