Sweet Jesús - I'm not wading into that nonsense.
1. You're not a securities lawyer.
2. You referred to 'my legal pals tell me'. You're paying heed to some clown online that shares your partisan view on crypto. And now you won't cite whatever it is they're putting out there. Evidently, they lack credibility - just like you. There's nothing to discuss.
Absolute nonsense. You're trying to cover your tracks now. You referred to your 'legal pals' - BS. You're regurgitating some online source or other. There's nothing wrong with that but you are a tad short on confidence when you can't cite that info directly. Clearly, they lack credibility. And maybe you work in finance but you know diddly squat about crypto on a professional level. Don't tell fibs. If you were anyway close to it there's no way you'd be referring to Coinbase Earn as a stalking product.If your a person of intelligence, experience and go the primary sources and cant cite yourself......who can you cite?.....do you always require @tecate for example a weatherman to tell you what way the wind is blowing? Read the SEC vs. Ripple verdict...what I've told you is all in there.
Coinbase Earn is a staking product, not a stalking product.I thought it was a typo but four typos?
Can you point us to the online presence of the "my legal pals tell me" guy?
As part of the smokescreen you go on the attack, giving a list of folks that you say I've cited. If that's true (it's not) - then post the links. You also suggest that I've cited anonymous twitter accounts. I've cited more material than anyone here but I'm pretty confident you'll be hard pressed to find a citation I've provided to an anon twitter account. More lies.
You maintain that you made the same typo four times? Whatever.Resorting to jeering my typos is what I would expect
You're not a securities lawyer. You have zero credibility in this area. You alluded to working in finance. If you're going to use that as backing for your views here, you'll have to dox yourself entirely. 'Working in finance' is a broad church.when you cant tackle my arguments on the facts.
You weren't talking about 'staking' when you name dropped your 'legal pals said' nonsense. You used that as clout but when called on it, you won't cite the source.Dont need legal pals on the STAKING piece
I'm not a 'resident crypto expert' (as I've always pointed out). I have a modicum of humility, something that's entirely lacking from your big phat claims expressed in the absolute sense on securities law..I'm surprised that as askaboutmoney's resident crypto expert you dont seem to be up to date on this stuff
Yes, shift the goal posts to the case where the SEC got a win. Nobody was talking about Kraken. Nobody was talking about Coinbase either. The subject at hand was SEC vs. Ripple.Now for my example:
I'm just going to let that stand on its own rickety legs right there.BTC is never getting back to $67,617. quite the opposite.
You have zero clue what you're talking about. If it wasn't for 'crypto' BTC would have blown through $100K. People who thought they had bought BTC hadn't (as some of the wayward centralized platforms were not even buying it on their behalf).dont you get it the MLM, ponzis, pyramids & scams in the EU and the USA.....were the locomotion pulling BTC up to $67,617.
That was a convenient pivot once I had called you on your 'legal pals' nonsense.You dont need a weatherman to know which the wind blows....my main cite is this....just read the case finding:
https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-07/SEC vs Ripple 7-13-23.pdf
FFS. It was already clear that there was a move being taken by the Biden Admin against crypto. Stop taking credit for something you read online, while getting the actual prediction 'Bitcoin would unravel' wrong.Like I said two years ago....in my last nostradamus prediction....that has turned out to be correct btw
Thanks! There have been plenty of god awful days and good days along the way - and I'm sure there will be plenty more of both...but you're right - it's certainly one more https://archive.is/xFvgA (milestone event) unlocked. ETF approval will bring with it a whole set of new challenges also - so plenty of twists n' turns ahead still.tecate, I hope you are having a pleasant day
George Orwell, 1984He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.
I do have greater hopes for various use cases to be pursued with regard to Bitcoin. You're right about that.
lol. Let me guess - they're going to get their own guys on the board of Bitcoin, Inc., right? Will Larry Fink or Jamie Dimon be named the new Bitcoin CEO?BTC might as well be USD now.....various three letter US agencies and Wall St. elites are driving the bus now......and they'd like your hopes to take a seat down the back of that metaphorical bus & stay quiet. They're the captain now.
Why would you think that when nobody has made such a claim or inference?I thought that bitcoin and anyone connected with it were the sole purveyors of all that's wrong in the world?
Oh, I dunno, just a hunch (or the total lack of a balanced discussion of the matter).Why would you think that when nobody has made such a claim or inference?
Oh, I dunno, just a hunch (or the total lack of a balanced discussion of the matter).
I don't recall any mention of a spot bitcoin ETF in your original thesis on the last bull market ATH price never being reached again. I believe you said that bitcoin wouldn't survive because the powers that be would shut it down and bitcoin couldn't possibly survive in a high interest rate environment.
It's no surprise to me that in all that I put to you, that's all you've chosen to run with. And beyond that I disagree. There has been zero balance to your take on this subject.It is no surprise that you believe something completely false.
But why do you believe I said that bitcoin wouldn't survive because the powers that be would shut it down and bitcoin couldn't possibly survive in a high interest rate environment?It's no surprise to me that in all that I put to you, that's all you've chosen to run with. And beyond that I disagree. There has been zero balance to your take on this subject.
@letitroll : I don't recall any mention of a spot bitcoin ETF in your original thesis on the last bull market ATH price never being reached again. I believe you said that bitcoin wouldn't survive because the powers that be would shut it down and bitcoin couldn't possibly survive in a high interest rate environment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?