Estate "is the subject of a bond and is being completed by the receiver"

Quite possible the builder had paid an insurance bond to cover something going wrong, in compliance with planning permission conditions.
 
The old saying caveat emptor buyer beware applies.

I was informed by our LA that no map of open space taken in charge for public viewing and raise whole question of compliance with condition all condition of the PP ?.

the only person a homeowner can go back to is developer . Homeowner have two choices

Ignore the condition of the planning permission, risky business, for once the liquidation complete well they bye bye ever being in a position to be able to warrant compliance.


or

Issue the Application under S24 of the MUD Act to compel developer to complete the transfer of common area to the OMC as a completed development under S5 of MUD Act (80 per cent of the units for which PP granted built and sold) and under S7 a continuing obligation to comply with planning permission building regulations including condition for establishment of management company to maintain in our case landscaped areas.

u may find, like here that the developer or receiver will not dispute the claim BUT problem identifying common areas (areas man co to maintain under the PP) if maps of open spaces taken in charge by LA not available.

LA pursue bonds to bring estates up to taking in charge stage in compliance with conditions of the PP but overlooking that other condition calling for the establishment of a management company to maintain areas not taken in charge ...up to homeowner again.
 
Back
Top