BIG-notorious
Registered User
- Messages
- 248
No it isn't. You reference a paper and make a statement which is in no way connected with the paper you reference. The role of information asymmetry regarding product quality in distorting market pricing is in no way related to signalling in game theory. And the usual investigations effectively eliminate information asymmetry anyway making it even more irrelevant to whatever point you seem to believe you made.It’s explained here.
And even if you think someone isn't serious why would you not act as if you believe they are if the house is worth buying? If fhey send contracts to your solicitor that's a very strong signal that they're serious, and these days you'd anyway be a fool to stop looking until a sale is nailed down.
They should put in just enough effort so they get a quick sale at market price. The last 5% on a €500k sale might be the price of a new car for you but it's not going to equate to even a good night out for the well dressed salesperson by the time they pay tax.By that logic they shouldn't bother putting any effort in to selling at all.![]()
Remember that an estate agent's first and most important sale is to the owner who is selling the property. Once that's done 90% or more of their fee is money in the bank in a sellers market. Would you break your back puttinginbtwice as much work for an extra 11%? When the same time selling yourself to another vendor would double it instead?