Hello all, thank you in advance for reading and sharing any opinions or advice!
I have been with my employer in the same role for 7 years. Since the first year there has been a verbal agreement consisting of non-performance related bonus amounting to roughly an extra months wage. This was to counteract the fact that there are no overtimes paid, pensions contributions or perks such as healthcare etc.
For the past 7 years, the yearly bonus amount was in line with the aforementioned agreement. However this year it was unexpectedly 25-30% of the expected value with the explanation that there isn't enough money for them. This was in stark contrast in to the information told to staff in passing by the head of company that bonuses are as usual. It was confirmed that there are no issues with employee performance and it was confirmed that bonus payments are not performance related.
As you can imagine all this was quite the unpleasant surprise to staff. For the past 7 years bonus payments (while not stated in contracts but confirmed verbally to be paid out yearly and not be performance related) were made yearly in similair amounts I wonder what options there are.
From some online research I have come to the concept of contractual entitlement based on past practice. THis is discussed in numerous cases/law advice websites but is well summaries by McCann Fitzgerald as:
I have been with my employer in the same role for 7 years. Since the first year there has been a verbal agreement consisting of non-performance related bonus amounting to roughly an extra months wage. This was to counteract the fact that there are no overtimes paid, pensions contributions or perks such as healthcare etc.
For the past 7 years, the yearly bonus amount was in line with the aforementioned agreement. However this year it was unexpectedly 25-30% of the expected value with the explanation that there isn't enough money for them. This was in stark contrast in to the information told to staff in passing by the head of company that bonuses are as usual. It was confirmed that there are no issues with employee performance and it was confirmed that bonus payments are not performance related.
As you can imagine all this was quite the unpleasant surprise to staff. For the past 7 years bonus payments (while not stated in contracts but confirmed verbally to be paid out yearly and not be performance related) were made yearly in similair amounts I wonder what options there are.
From some online research I have come to the concept of contractual entitlement based on past practice. THis is discussed in numerous cases/law advice websites but is well summaries by McCann Fitzgerald as:
- "Ordinarily, awards of bonus will depend on the performance of the employer’s business, or the employee’s work performance, or both, in the preceding year. Nevertheless, even where bonuses are described as discretionary, an employee might have a contractual entitlement to it as an implied term of the employment contract. This might arise, for instance, by virtue of custom and practice whereby an employee receives a bonus at a particular level consistently over a prolonged period of time.
- ...Assuming a bonus is discretionary, employers will not enjoy a carte blanche when it comes to the exercise of that discretion, which must not be exercised in a perverse, capricious or irrational way, and which must be exercised bona fide and consistently with the implied duty of trust and confidence."