When I accepted my job in early 2005, my package included a management bonus + annual performance related pay increases all laid out in a contract which both parties signed in the usual way.
Last May I accepted a lateral move and though I wasn’t issued a new contract I verbally checked with my employers that my package would not be adversely affected which they confirmed it wouldn’t.
Now the issue I have is that HR have said that my package at the outset was incorrect, in that my level of job is not eligible for this management bonus and they want to take it off me in order to align me with others in my job level.
I've told them its not my problem that they've messed up and they can't change my T&C as this forms the basis of my deciding to accept the initial job at the outset.... a lot of blah blah later and they're offering to buy my bonus off me, as in settle for what this years bonus would be “as a gesture of **good will” plus next years based on this years salary. So this means I’ll never get another bonus again from 2008 onwards, just the standard pay increases.
**I really don't like the sound of this as I'll be worse off than I am now. I’m annoyed that they’ve used the term ‘gesture of goodwill’, I don’t see them paying my 2006 bonus as good will, its their obligation based on my contract!
My point is I could work here 'till I'm 65 in which case I loose out on the bonus facility for 2007 + 2008 + 2009 to eternity. Anyway, in order to buy some time I said I needed to think about it and I asked them to draw up a draft proposal. Quick as lightening a letter was produced the same day in it they're offering me a lump sum payment which amounts to what next year’s bonus would be.
I actually think they're breaking the law by trying to force me to agree to renewed terms and conditions, hence they're looking for a signed consent. I want to show them that I'm willing to negotiate but I'm not willing to settle for just 1 year’s bonus when hypothetically if I do work here 'till I'm 65 I could be passing up on 20 years worth of bonus .
On the other hand, who’s to say that I’ll stay in this job even for the duration of 2007 in which case should I just take the advanced bonus or try to get them to agree to a larger figure based on lost earnings potential from next year on.
Sorry for the long post.
Opinions appreciated.
Last May I accepted a lateral move and though I wasn’t issued a new contract I verbally checked with my employers that my package would not be adversely affected which they confirmed it wouldn’t.
Now the issue I have is that HR have said that my package at the outset was incorrect, in that my level of job is not eligible for this management bonus and they want to take it off me in order to align me with others in my job level.
I've told them its not my problem that they've messed up and they can't change my T&C as this forms the basis of my deciding to accept the initial job at the outset.... a lot of blah blah later and they're offering to buy my bonus off me, as in settle for what this years bonus would be “as a gesture of **good will” plus next years based on this years salary. So this means I’ll never get another bonus again from 2008 onwards, just the standard pay increases.
**I really don't like the sound of this as I'll be worse off than I am now. I’m annoyed that they’ve used the term ‘gesture of goodwill’, I don’t see them paying my 2006 bonus as good will, its their obligation based on my contract!
My point is I could work here 'till I'm 65 in which case I loose out on the bonus facility for 2007 + 2008 + 2009 to eternity. Anyway, in order to buy some time I said I needed to think about it and I asked them to draw up a draft proposal. Quick as lightening a letter was produced the same day in it they're offering me a lump sum payment which amounts to what next year’s bonus would be.
I actually think they're breaking the law by trying to force me to agree to renewed terms and conditions, hence they're looking for a signed consent. I want to show them that I'm willing to negotiate but I'm not willing to settle for just 1 year’s bonus when hypothetically if I do work here 'till I'm 65 I could be passing up on 20 years worth of bonus .
On the other hand, who’s to say that I’ll stay in this job even for the duration of 2007 in which case should I just take the advanced bonus or try to get them to agree to a larger figure based on lost earnings potential from next year on.
Sorry for the long post.
Opinions appreciated.