Details of ptsb sale of mortgages

Brendan Burgess

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
54,774
ptsb gave more information today. There was a submission and I will try to get a copy of that. But I picked this up through watching it.

1,300 Buy to Lets have been surrendered recently and the shortfalls written off. Of these, 2/3rds are still occupied by the tenants. 400 are empty and are for sale.

Up to 1,000 borrowers may benefit from Mortgage to Rent with iCare and Home for Life.

There are 10,400 untreated and non-performing loans (which are being sold?)
4,900 did not meet the revised arrangements
1700 refused the treatmentoffered
1100 no sustainable treatment possible
2700 no engagement at all ( Average for this group 5 years or €50,000)

The average arrears for the 10,400 is €30,000 or the equivalent of 3 years
30%(?) paid nothing at all in 2017. Not sure 30% of what?

Total NPLs - €5.3 billion -
Mortgages to be sold: €3.7 billion about 50% provision made

4,300 performing splits will be sold (despite ptsb not wanting to sell them.)
1,000 (?) non peforming splits being sold
1,000 splits not being sold (eligible for MTR, tracker reviews,insolvency, deaths.)

6,279 splits in total

Average warehouse on a split mortgage: 51% [ By comparison AIB warehoused 50% maximum]


It takes 32 attempts on average to get a non-engaging customer to take a call.

10,000 properties - not engaged or failed treatment
 
I prepared this table from the original press statement

upload_2018-3-22_16-3-36.png


“good” non performing loans

Project Glas also includes some loans which are currently subject to agreed forbearance measures,

but which remain categorised as NPLs and which, therefore, we are required to address.


Ulster Bank

Selling 7,000 out of 20,000


Sold 3,000 back in 2016 - €600m - €400m buy to let- €200m home loans or 1,000


Total mortgages over 2 years in arrears: 26,000 - ptsb seems to have 40% of them.
 
No.

The EBA's stupid rule is that a loan which is not adhering to its original loan terms is non-performing. It's madness.

So if you have a mortgage of €200k remaining on a house worth €400k and the term was extended 5 years ago, it's an NPL.

Brendan
 
Brendan Burgess said:
So if you have a mortgage of €200k remaining on a house worth €400k and the term was extended 5 years ago, it's an NPL
Click to expand...
That's not entirely correct Brendan. An NPE loan can be 'cured' and can exit NPE status after 12 months if it's performing to new agreement and is not otherwise impaired.
 
Hi @Brendan Burgess

In terms of loans which are classified as NPLs indefinitely, in the case of PTSB this includes those loans which have a portion warehoused, regardless of how the 'good' portion performs.

PTSB has sought regulatory approval from ECB for a proposal that if they write off the warehoused portion, and the remaining loan is performing to agreement, that these can reclassified as performing loans.

As it currently stands, PTSB could sell these loans to a fund, the fund agree a debt forgiveness with the borrower's writing off the warehoused portion, and then sell the loans back to a bank as performing loans. But PTSB can't just do this themselves, which is what they want to do.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business...eprieve-for-thousands-of-homeowners-1.3426878
 
PTSB has announces that they are not selling the split mortgages

PTSB will confirm at 7am this morning that it is withdrawing approx. 4,300 PDH homes linked to performing Split Mortgages from the Project Glas Loan Sale and that the number of properties now included in the sale is approximately 11,200 – down from 18,000 originally.

Here is a link to a short audio clip of Jeremy Masding commenting on the decision to remove the split mortgages from the loan sale....no restrictions on use.

https://soundcloud.com/gordon_mrm/ptsb-ceo-jeremy-masding-on-removal-of-splits-from-loan-salemp3



Quote from Jeremy Masding below.


Speaking today Jeremy Masding, CEO of Permanent TSB said: “Since the launch of Project Glas there have been some developments including engagement with the Regulatory Authorities on the treatment of Split Mortgages and the emergence of solutions which could enable us to maintain the day-to-day relationship with the account holders. Therefore, we have decided to withdraw mortgages linked to about 4,300 homes (par value of approximately €0.9 billion) from the Project Glas sale process. We will continue our engagement on the regulatory classification of these mortgages and, at the same time, we will explore different options including ones that enable us to maintain the day-to-day relationship with the account holders.”

“The particular make up of loans included in portfolio sales like Glas always evolves as the process moves forward. As a result of the removal of PDH3 Split Mortgages and other decisions we have taken, the number of properties linked to loans remaining in Project Glas has reduced from an initial 18,000 properties to approximately 11,200 properties. The value of the loans remaining in Project Glas is approximately €2.2 billion and we believe it will complete in the current year”.
 
Would I be right in thinking that a split mortgage with a regular/even one off review clause would be deemed a npl as it is essentially set up to be restructured on a regular basis triggering a possible npl classification each time the loan is modified?
 
No.
The review clause doesn't make it an NPL. The fact that they don't really expect the warehoused part to be repaid does.
Split mortgages are all NPLs.
 
Last edited:
But ptsb did not sell any split mortgage which was performing in line with the split agreement. So the classification as NPL does not affect the borrower.

Brendan
 
Correct, unless they were also classed as NPLs for another reason, split mortgages were not sold.
It's interesting to see the political reactions to these sales after the fact. The sales have all been long flagged, so reactions at this stage are no more than attention seeking.

PTSB are seeking to have ECB rules changed since that they can put real solutions in place for split mortgages - write off the warehoused loan, and treat the balance as performing. @Brendan Burgess has long highlighted that these are profitable for the bank to keep. They want to keep them, but they can't.

If any politicians actually wanted to make a difference, it's at ECB level they need to focus their attentions.
 
Ok. I thought the ecb/cbi commented on this at the start of the week stating that they could be considered pl's once the active part of the loan would be paid down first. Ie. The law of unintended consequences from the review is the loan gets knocked back to npl. I don't see how they don't expect warehoused portion of the loan to get paid back as it's still secured against an asset. I think if these loans get sorted within the main banks the political hand grenade will be well on the way to been diffused.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top