BallinaTipp
Registered User
- Messages
- 8
Would anyone have an opinion(know for certain) with regard to the actual position following the Insuract Act 1989, IIA 1995, Insurance Act 2000 etc. with regard to the responsibilites of an Insurance Undertaking for a tied agent?
Is it still the case that an insurance undertaking is fully responsible for all the activities of a tied agent?
Would this be the case for an Assurance Company and a Bank or Building Society?
I would welcome your opinions?
Is it still the case that an insurance undertaking is fully responsible for all the activities of a tied agent?
Would this be the case for an Assurance Company and a Bank or Building Society?
I would welcome your opinions?