Deferring your State Pension (Contributory) - break even point is age 88

Practical mathematics. financial planning and all aspects of money handling should be taught in our schools as a seseparate subject
Home economics, business studies, or accounting for example?
 
Ok, I thought that it was paid every Xmas.

But 52 x €289.30 = €15,044 which is still different to what's in the previous table.
It's actually 52.18 weeks per year or 29.09 fortnights, to account for 365 days per year and the leap year day

365 x 4 years + 1 leap day = 365.25 average over 4 years / 7 days per week = 52.18
 
It's actually 52.18 weeks per year or 29.09 fortnights, to account for 365 days per year and the leap year day

365 x 4 years + 1 leap day = 365.25 average over 4 years / 7 days per week = 52.18
Really? Where does the DSP outline that payment calculation method?
 
Really? Where does the DSP outline that payment calculation method?
It doesn't matter if they say it or not, it's the way things are.
On average there are 52.18 Fridays in every year, so on average they are paying 52.18 times the weekly rate per year.
 
None of these are leaving cert core subjects.
Great if somebody can do all these, but a core subject dealing with personal finance should be mandatory for all students.
I suspect that some sections of society would view universal financial literacy with something approaching alarm
 
Almost no one seems to have noticed it but the state pension contributory has seen an inflation-adjusted decline over the last number of years too:

Plenty of talk about the cost of living crisis which is what this amounts to. Compensated for by extra double payments and various other payments from the state.
 
I know cases of people not drawing the pension while working which of course is possible and allowable.
 
Not drawing the pension isn't the same as actually actively deferring it. Someone doing the former will lose out if they passively fail to claim it for more that 6 months. That's the maximum backdating period for late claims.

Incorrect information corrected below:
 
Last edited:
I think that not claiming the pension up to age 70 is automatically a deferral.

If a person over age 70 doesn't claim their pension they would loose out by being only allowed 6 months backdating.
 
I think that not claiming the pension up to age 70 is automatically a deferral.
Sorry, my mistake. Looks like you are correct. I thought that one had to inform the department before normal pension age that one was deferring the classroom but that doesn't seem to be the case.
 
Might there be an argument in favour of deferral if a person (who will be assessed using TCA) is a bit short of 2080 contributions but his or her spouse is a few years younger and would be entitled to a better survivor's pension for a statistically longer time or would that play no role in the calculation?

In my example I'm assuming the survivor's pension is better than any state pension the survivor would be entitled to. That will obviously not always or even generally be the case. My wife will likely never receive a state pension from Ireland as we live in Germany and she has never worked in Ireland but she will some day receive a survivor's pension from Ireland through my contributions. I'm going to be a little short of the 2080 at 66 but not yet exactly sure how many short. I hope the likes of pre-entry credits are less of a black box by the time I approach 66 and that I will know exactly how many contributions I have by then and can make an informed decision about deferral.
 
If she predceases you, she will not get a survivors payment.
Also if you died in the deferral period, there would be no state pension in your name so she might not be able to access a survivors pension.

There is an element of risk in any strategy.
 
Might there be an argument in favour of deferral if a person (who will be assessed using TCA) is a bit short of 2080 contributions but his or her spouse is a few years younger and would be entitled to a better survivor's pension for a statistically longer time or would that play no role in the calculation?
Statistically men live shorter lives but are much more likely to generate a survivors pension as wives are on average younger and women live longer.

If there was a big age gap between you and wife in her favour I would encourage delay.
 
Maybe I am talking complete rubbish here as the conditions for qualifying for a survivor's pension seem to be totally different to a normal contributory pension, with only the previous 3 or 5 years being taken into consideration, in which case it would be irrelevant? I just assumed the survivor's pension was based off the contributory pension received by the deceased but having read a bit more that seems incorrect.
 
Last edited:
You did not read careful enough. You only read about the qualifying conditions telling you the requirements how to get a foothold onto the scheme. The contributory survivors pension is not based on the previous 3 or 5 years. It is based on a variety of conditions to qualify for it at all- and furthermore on the amount of PRSI contributions paid or credited by either the deceased or the surviving person.

Check out this here and read to the very end:

One of the biggest differences to the standard contributory pension is the minimum amount of paid PRSI conditions- you only need 260 to qualify for a minimum payment- and not the 520 they ask for now.

There is also a means tested non contributory survivors pension around.
 
This document says the following:


Widow’s, Widower’s or Surviving Civil Partner’s Contributory Pension

To get your rate of payment, we first calculate your Short Yearly Average. If this is 39 PRSI contributions or greater, you will qualify for the maximum rate for
this pension. If it is below 39, we calculate your Long Yearly Average. If this is 48 or greater, you will qualify for the maximum weekly rate. If it is 47 or less, you will qualify for a reduced rate of payment.

My bold. What is the short yearly average?
 
AI says the following:
"The "short yearly average" in the context of a Widow's, Widower's, or Surviving Civil Partner's Contributory Pension, refers to the average number of social insurance (PRSI) contributions paid or credited in the 3 or 5 tax years before the "relevant date". The relevant date is either the date of the spouse's death or the date the spouse reached 66, whichever is earlier. A yearly average of 39 or more contributions typically qualifies for the maximum pension rate."

This means that your above statement is indeed correct in certain cases.
It all depends on the cases' exact special circumstances.
The relevant date is another important corner stone of the sheme.
 
Back
Top