Not good enough, where is the accountability and diciplinary action.
Just watched "lapgate" on youtube. I dont think its fair to say he groped her - not that I speak from experience .... your honour.... but I would have thought that groping focussed on particular areas of the anatomy.
That said it was definitely inappropriate, she didnt seem impressed - nor did she throw a wobbler either - I think its speculation whether drink played a role. In fairness to him it was clearly affectionate/playful rather than aggressive.
Overall I'd say its well down our list of problems and the public embarassment for him is probably punishment enough. (whereas if it had been unseen and she complained him then a fine, a stern warning etc would be in order).
As for the lap thing. I think the pictures speak for themselves. Must try it on my colleague this afternoon. As long as I am laughing and not aggressive, she won't mind. It will be great craic.
Yes, now that you mention it, he should have been ritually disembowelled on the plinth of the dail that instant. On the plus side I might get to attend in person and throw rotten fruit at the gallows along with the baying mob.
Has this any affect on the very important discussions/ decisions apart altogether from lapgate.
Yes, they probably were!I'm sure the few with real input we're drinking ....
.. but then I recall listening when Michael D called Cal Thomas something nautical.
What was Norris thinking??
It was Michael Graham who was called something that sounded like 'anchor' by MDH.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?