I agree a collaborative approach works far better for both parties rather than an overly adversarial one. The trouble comes when the landlord or tenant gets ideas of entitlement. You mention covering the mortgage...this is an irrelevance really.
The market does not care if you even have a mortgage, much less if the repayments went up, or if you are forced to make up the shortfall between rent and mortgage each month. A landlord who uses his mortgage repayments as a barometer of the rent he should be asking is using flawed logic. The market does not take his repayments into account. Likewise, a tenant who uses his income as a barometer of what he should pay in rent for a certain property may well find there's a huge disparity between what he can pay and what the property can be let for.
Due to the prices charged for properties in the last few years many landlords are saddled with large mortgages for buy-to-lets that may not be paying their way. While it may be a natural reaction to try and pass this on to the tenant (at least here), it is not possible to do so unless the real market factors favour this also.
The market does not care if you even have a mortgage, much less if the repayments went up, or if you are forced to make up the shortfall between rent and mortgage each month. A landlord who uses his mortgage repayments as a barometer of the rent he should be asking is using flawed logic. The market does not take his repayments into account. Likewise, a tenant who uses his income as a barometer of what he should pay in rent for a certain property may well find there's a huge disparity between what he can pay and what the property can be let for.
Due to the prices charged for properties in the last few years many landlords are saddled with large mortgages for buy-to-lets that may not be paying their way. While it may be a natural reaction to try and pass this on to the tenant (at least here), it is not possible to do so unless the real market factors favour this also.