Court: Virgin illegally incentives staff to discourage customers from switching

Another update on this case.
In his judgment last month, the judge said that while Virgin argued the financial incentives to agents were for resolving customer issues, it was clear the event which triggered the payment of the incentive was the retention of the customer.

...

Following submissions on Wednesday from Eileen Barrington SC, for Comreg, and Niall Buckley SC, for Virgin Media, in relation to the formal orders to be made, the judge said he would make an order in relation to contract termination in accordance with wording suggested by Comreg, subject to amendment.
 
Interesting thread.

VM score 1.2 on Trustpilot. Dire. (Vodafone score 3.9)

We signed a new contract last June, adding Sky Sports and TV (we've been with Virgin for years for BB and landline only). The total was/is €109 per month. Almost immediately, I started being overcharged. Eventually, their complaints department sorted it and we've been charged €109 since. But, another (identical) contract appeared in my inbox in September - totally unsolicited - for €131.50 per month. I queried this and never heard back. Since we are being charged the original amount I let it go.

But, I will be phoning them in mid-May to cancel the mid-June contract. It will be interesting to see if they raise the September contract then.

SIRO has put manners on Virgin. I note they're not even competing on the SIRO platform in some areas. Unfortunately, SIRO is not in Dublin 14 yet.

D.
 
If Virgin have their own network in an area as far as I can tell they will use that and not offer any services via SIRO.
 
If Virgin have their own network in an area as far as I can tell they will use that and not offer any services via SIRO.
That was my understanding too. Virgin have their legacy coaxial network in many urban areas. And now they have their own fibre network in many areas. So if you go with VM for fibre then you're on their fibre network. But if you go with any of the other fibre service providers then you're on a different (SIRO/NBI?) network.

Having said that I had a first time fibre installation last year so they (KN Circet - on behalf of OpenEir) brought the fibre from the roadside into the house and installed the ONT (Optical Network Terminal). I had signed up with Sky so they also provided the Sky router and activated the service. But it was a disaster so I cancelled in the 14 day cooling off period and instead went to Eir. I expected that they would just provide a new router but another KN Circet/OpenEir guy called and replaced the ONT and also provided the Eir router and activated the service.

If I switch to VM fibre when my current Eir contract is up I'm not clear in what will happen. They'll run a new fibre cable from the kerbside into the house? Or will they patch things in the manhole? And will they replace the ONT again and give me a VM router?
 
Maybe a new ONT and yes to a new VM router.
Yeah, I'm hoping that that'll be the extent of it. I certainly don't want a second fibre cable coming to the house. I guess I'll see. Almost certainly I'll be switching from Eir when my 12 months is up (the service and support has been excellent but I don't want to end up penalised by the loyal customer rates that all providers impose) and it's quite likely that I'll be moving to VM...
 
I expected that they would just provide a new router but another KN Circet/OpenEir guy called and replaced the ONT and also provided the Eir router and activated the service.

I wonder if the reason for the "disaster" was the first ONT was faulty or of lower standard.

Maybe Eir have different standards, or there was a report on the connection that it had had issues.
 
Maybe Eir have different standards
My contract with pure is coming to an end in March so we're upgrading to full fibre
Pure wont offer me any deal as I not a new customer but will renew my current package at new customer rate
So rang Eir to see what they would offer and was told "Nope we can't offer you any fibre packages at this moment in time"
But followed it with "if you get one of the other providers to connect you, we can then offer you a package
So yes Eir do have a "different standard" to other providers

Will probably go with Sky as their offering a fairly good package with BB, sky stream and Netflix for €45
 
I would love to have some legislation akin to California's Automatic Renewal Law, there's much more to it but crucially if you signed up online they'd have to give you a method to cancel online too:

If a consumer enrolled in an auto-renewal or continuous-service plan online, they must be able to cancel it online at will, and the business cannot engage in any steps that obstruct or delay consumer’s ability to cancel immediately.

 
Imagine if public sector helplines behaved like this?

But, this is the market at work, I suppose. And they’re too big for common sense legislation.

D.
 
12-month contracts for energy, internet, etc with increases when you remain are very irritating and should be banned. I make a point of doing a search each year, and will change supplier for one Euro difference in annual cost. AI is great for finding the best deal. You just have to formulate your question properly.
How I deal with the difficult people they have on the cancellation team is by refusing to engage; when they ask "why are you terminating the contract" I say "no reason". Similar answers to every other question, this messes with their strategy and leaves them no place to go, except cancel the contract.
 
Make it illegal to offer new customers a better deal than existing customers.

Alternatively, make it mandatory that all offers are available to existing customers.
 
For me the issue is not the new customer discount and the subsequent price hike it's the barriers to switching. Reduce that and it's up to people to be inert if they choose.

Firms can offer teaser rates because of the many households that don't switch. I don't see why those who actively manage their subscriptions and get the best deals should be effectively pushed for other people's lazy behaviour.

Banning discounts would just discourage everyone from shopping around. It compounds the current problem and I don't see how that's a good outcome for society.
 
Back
Top