Yes, thanks. I am aware of that. As it stands my Mum is taking care of all of the bills/taxes attached to the house. She put the house in our names on the advice that it would avoid the fair deal scheme. If i had a relationship with my sisters we would just split the tax between the 3 of us, but I don't. It seems strange that one person can be made responsible for the entire LPT without them being consulted on the matter.Nothing to do with you Mother, if she does not own the house.
Yes, thanks. I am aware of that. As it stands my Mum is taking care of all of the bills/taxes attached to the house. She put the house in our names on the advice that it would avoid the fair deal scheme. If i had a relationship with my sisters we would just split the tax between the 3 of us, but I don't. It seems strange that one person can be made responsible for the entire LPT without them being consulted on the matter.
I think you may be right. This solicitor was hired by my Mum and sisters. I didn't have any dealing with them and had my own solicitor to advise me on the contract, but just to help me with the contract. My Mum's solicitor organised the purchase of the house. It's just a shock that I'm the person liable for the LPT.If the house transfer was done recently, is it possible that the solicitor who performed the transfer might have been the person who nominated you as the person liable to pay LPT?
I did. My sister says it must have been my solicitor who did it, but I only contracted him to take a look at the contract I was being asked to sign. He didn't handle the house purchase at all. It was the solicitor hired by my Mum and sisters who did that. To be honest, I don't think my sister really believes it was my solicitor. I think she just said that to put my Mum off the track. I'd say this was done intentionally, knowing that as soon as my Mum is unable to give instructions on her finances, I'll be left to foot the bill for the LPT on my own.As it was your mother who transferred the ownership of the house to all 3 and she currently pays all the bills have you tried speaking to her to ask why the LPT is registered to your own name only?
Thanks for the reply. I totally agree with you about the hassle of shared ownership. I encouraged my mother not to do it, but my younger sister is a bully and very money focused and my Mum doesn't like to go against her. It made the whole purchase so stressful for my Mum because my sisters kept documentation back from me until the last moment and then told my Mum that she'd lose the house if I didn't sign it by a tight deadline, which I just physically couldn't do. It was all very unpleasant and so unfair for my elderly Mum. But like you say it's water under the bridge now and there's nothing to be done about it.What arrangement (if any) was reached when the transfer of ownership was made?
I think you have a massive headache here in the shape of shared ownership of a house with people you don’t speak to. I think this is a much bigger hassle than the benefit of possible Fair Deal savings but that’s water under the bridge.
In the short run pay the LPT and write letters periodically to your sisters looking for their share. Keep copies. If they don’t pay you will be on a better footing to recoup it from the eventual house sale.
It seems strange that one person can be made responsible for the entire LPT without them being consulted on the matter.
Only one person can be nominated to pay the LPT. If they do not pay then Revenue can go after the others. As the OP requires a Tax Clearance Certificate they don't have much choice but to pay.
Did you read the link?I assume you mean that only one person can nominate him or herself, which didn't happen on this occasion?
(If not, then I hereby nominate you to pay my LPT!)
In our case it was assigned to the first person named on the Property register/deeds.Did you read the link?
It's likely the mother instructed the solicitor who oversaw the transfer. OP, ask your mother.
It's likely the mother instructed the solicitor who oversaw the transfer. OP, ask your mother.
As it was your mother who transferred the ownership of the house to all 3 and she currently pays all the bills have you tried speaking to her to ask why the LPT is registered to your own name only?
I did. My sister says it must have been my solicitor who did it, but I only contracted him to take a look at the contract I was being asked to sign. He didn't handle the house purchase at all. It was the solicitor hired by my Mum and sisters who did that. To be honest, I don't think my sister really believes it was my solicitor. I think she just said that to put my Mum off the track. I'd say this was done intentionally, knowing that as soon as my Mum is unable to give instructions on her finances, I'll be left to foot the bill for the LPT on my own.
Thanks for the suggestion to ask Revenue about documentation. I am going to do this. There's no harm in asking after all.It certainly does. It sounds plain wrong and may well be both fraudulent and a breach of GDPR.
So why not email revenue's LPT section (or their data protection officer), inform them that you have been registered to pay LPT on a jointly owned property without your knowledge or consent. Ask them to send you a copy of whatever documentation they have on file. (I think you'd be entitled to it under FoI) Bear in mind that Revenue take this kind of thing seriously.
And be sure to make your sisters aware that you're having it investigated on the basis that you consider that it may be fraudulent and an abuse of GDPR!
There's lots of reading material for you here, if you're interested in pursuing this angle:
I should have clarified this earlier, but the solicitor was appointed by my sister to execute my fathers will, by my Mum to sell the family home, and then by my two sisters to buy a new house to be owned by the 3 of us, and lived in by my Mum until she dies. Therefore I'd imagine that in respect to LPT it was my sisters that instructed the solicitor to put me down as LPT, or the solicitor picked someone themselves. If I was alphabetically the first amongst my sisters, I'd suspect this was the case, but I'm not.Did you read the link?
It's likely the mother instructed the solicitor who oversaw the transfer. OP, ask your mother.
I thought this too initially but I'm not the first person named on the deeds, I'm actually the last, and alphabetically I wouldn't be the first either.In our case it was assigned to the first person named on the Property register/deeds.
You may well be right re no breach of GDPR, as I provided my PPS number to the solicitor, but I'm going to look into it and the whole issue of consent anyway just to see if everything is above board.Ita annoying that it happened without the OP knowing and that the other joint owners wont pay their share, but all of the owners are jointly liable for LPT and one of them has to be the designated person, I cant see how it is a data breach or fraudelant that the OP is the designated person.
No-one nominated them as a randomer to be liable for the LPT on someone elses house. Its not useful to suggest that this could happen
Did you read the link?
It's likely the mother instructed the solicitor who oversaw the transfer. OP, ask your mother.
A solicitor can't represent both parties in a sale, so it doesn't arise. This of course wasn't a sale, it was a transfer where the person conducting the transfer can be the only one with legal representation and can dictate what names go on the order and in what sequence.And even if it did happen, what right has the solicitor conducting the sale got to take such an action?
I'm not sure this was a case of ownership transfer, but I'm not a legal expert so I could be wrong. My Mum sold the family home and gave us the proceeds from that sale to buy a new house that she can live in until she dies. The solicitor that handled the sale of the family home for my Mum, was appointed to buy the new house by my sisters. I wasn't privy to this arrangement. I contracted another solicitor to give me some independent advice on the purchase contract. Hope that makes sense.A solicitor can't represent both parties in a sale, so it doesn't arise. This of course wasn't a sale, it was a transfer where the person conducting the transfer can be the only one with legal representation and can dictate what names go on the order and in what sequence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?