Challenging a will for an intellectually disabled adult child

Northie

Registered User
Messages
108
I’ve approached a solicitor on this but hoping the good people of AAM might be able to let me know if they see any possible problems with the suggested solution.

I am one of three siblings, Sister1,2,3. My mother passed away and left a will covering two properties she held in her own name and the family home owned with my father. I (Sister 2) inherited one property, which I was living in and continue to live in, so was allowed the Dwelling House exemption on CAT. My younger sibling, Sister 3 inherited the other property which was just below her CAT threshold.

My father then passed away. An issue has now arisen around the family home. In his will my dad left it to Sister 2 and Sister 3 with a right of residence for Sister 1 who is intellectually disabled. She has always lived in the house and continues to do so, on her own. However she does not manage the bills or other ongoing responsibilities of the house, we do that for her.

If we follow the will as it stands Sister 3 is facing a substantial CAT bill that she is not in a position to meet. We are looking for a solution that will protect my older sister in her home.

The solicitor we met with has suggested the best course of action is to have Sister 1 challenge my fathers will on the basis that as my mother provided for Sister2 and Sister 3, then my father should have provided for Sister 1. However as she would not be able to deal with the long term responsibility of managing the house, the solicitor suggests we (Sister 2 and Sister3) place the house in a trust for Sister 1 with both of us as trustees. We have been advised that this allows the house to be inherited by Sister 1 (the value would be below her threshold), taking Sister 3 out of her CAT liability, while more importantly protecting Sister1 in the long term.

On the face of it seems like the ideal solution as it covers things like, what happens if either myself or Sister 3 died etc. But I’m worried that we are missing something on the tax side. I want to make sure that we aren’t missing anything that we would be liable for?

I know its long winded but it’s a fairly unique situation and we want to make sure we are doing the best for our sister. Sorry myself and Sister 3 are executors of the will.
 
Can yourself and Sister 3 not just disavow your interest in the property? I've seen that mentioned previously on here. Then your sister 1 can include sisters 2 & 3 in her will?
 
Summary

The family home has been left to Sisters 2 & 3 but their disabled sister 1 has a right of residence.

Sister 3 is facing a substantial CAT bill because she has already inherited a house which used up her CAT threshold.


Are you sure that there would be a big CAT bill? The value of the gift will be substantially reduced by the fact that your sister has a right of residence. Then it's halved again because you are inheriting the house jointly.

If the disabled sister challenges the will successfully, she will then own the house. I don't think that the other two sisters can simply place the house in trust for her. Or maybe that could be part of the settlement of the challenge?

When your disabled sister dies, you will face a CAT bill at that stage if you inherit the house.

If your disabled sister moves into a home, will you be able to sell the property for her benefit?

The simplest would be to calculate the CAT liability and remortgage the mortgage-free property to pay it. Then when your sister moves into a home, you own a property which you can as you like with.

Another solution would be that Sister 3 declines her share of the family home, leaving it in full to you. Would you face a CAT bill? It would have to be a very valuable home to exceed the CAT threshold after taking into account the reduction caused by the life interest.
 
Hi Brendan,

Even allowing for the right of residence and splitting the inheritance in half, my sister is still facing a CAT bill of over 50,000. She wouldn't be in a position to get a mortgage to cover this.

If the disabled sister challenges the will successfully, she will then own the house. I don't think that the other two sisters can simply place the house in trust for her. Or maybe that could be part of the settlement of the challenge?

This is one thing that sprang to mind for me as well, I am awaiting on a response from the solicitor on this.

We are aware we could be facing a CAT bill down the road if the disabled sister dies, but at that stage the house could be sold off to pay any bill.

We could also disavow the inheritance but this leaves my sister owning the house outright and both of us would be concerned about how she would manage this, particularly as she could be easily influenced. To some extent the same worry would be there if Sister 3 disavowed and left it to me (this was our initial starting point). CAT wise I would be facing a bill of a couple of thousand which I could cover however that leaves everything to do with my sister in my power and to some extent little sister clear and free.

I suppose there are two sides to this, the money side and how best to manage this, and the moral side of how best to take care of the sister.

Thankfully we all get on well (but this can change) and we are all reasonably young, between the ages of 32 and 38. Not something we thought we would be worring about at this stage.
 
Last edited:
@Northie

Sometimes in these diffcult cases things can emerge that substantially alter the situation. What I am thinking is what in fact was your fathers intention. It may be that uppermost in his mind was the protection of Sister1 and that he recognised that she could not be given the property and so conjured this up.

What the solicitor is saying is about s117 of Succession Act where essentially the will can be challenged by one or more of the siblings if your father did not provide for adequately. You dont tell us who looks after Sister1, what income she has etc - which is what you want to do.

A notion of a secret trust comes to mind where your fathers ongoing concern for Sister1 such as 'you will always lokk after her - wont you ..' could be evidence that his real intention was to create a trust for your sister and after her passing it would revert to S2 and S3.

If youd disavow the will - is she the sole beneficiary and could you impose a trust? I dont know but its where I would be looking.

You solicitor may need a trust specialist or he may in fact have the answer.

You could also contribute to a special life policy to discharge the CAT.
 
Back
Top