A
Agnitio
Guest
Hi,
Looking for a bit of advice on the merits of doing a CFA Vs a Masters in Investment and Treasury.
I have looked into the M.Sc. a bit and it seems to be a tough but very good course (part time over two years).
However, I was chatting to a guy today who has done both and he advised that content and volume of study on both are somewhat similar, with CFA being more detailed and now better recognised in the industry as the benchmark.
I am aware that the CFA has a high failure rate, that it is over three years, only one exam per year, and self thought (which necessitates a lot of discipline).
Guess I just want to read people's thoughts on both...career prospects etc...
Working in a Private Bank at the mo. Have a degree in Business and will hopefully complete QFA's in September.
Thanks.
Looking for a bit of advice on the merits of doing a CFA Vs a Masters in Investment and Treasury.
I have looked into the M.Sc. a bit and it seems to be a tough but very good course (part time over two years).
However, I was chatting to a guy today who has done both and he advised that content and volume of study on both are somewhat similar, with CFA being more detailed and now better recognised in the industry as the benchmark.
I am aware that the CFA has a high failure rate, that it is over three years, only one exam per year, and self thought (which necessitates a lot of discipline).
Guess I just want to read people's thoughts on both...career prospects etc...
Working in a Private Bank at the mo. Have a degree in Business and will hopefully complete QFA's in September.
Thanks.