Central Bank: 400,000 old credit cards being charged >23% which would be illegal for a new card

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
54,769
Update: I have replaced the Indo article with the Central Bank press release and edited the thread title accordingly.

Since 2022, under legislation, new credit card accounts cannot have an Annual Percentage Rate (APR) of greater than 23%. A review by the Central Bank of Ireland has found that, of the approximately 1.3 million credit card accounts in Ireland, over 400,000 are on APRs above 23% that pre-date this legislation. These customers may not be aware that they could get a cheaper rate on another product.

The review also identified other issues including poor handling of customer complaints, issues in how credit cards are marketed to customers, and limited supports provided to customers in financial difficulty. The Central Bank is following up directly with firms on these issues to ensure that appropriate actions are taken to address the findings of the review, including making customers on these higher interest rates aware of their options. In its letter to firms (PDF 118.59KB) the Central Bank also describes instances of good practice identified in some firms, which firms across the sector could follow.

Speaking on publication Director of Consumer Protection Colm Kincaid, said: "We completed this review of customer supports for credit card lending in the context of our ongoing work to ensure firms are supporting consumers in the face of cost of living challenges. On finding so many customers are on historic high rates, we have told relevant lenders to take action to make customers aware where they have these higher rate accounts, and to support them to consider options available to them if they wish to make a change.

"Taking some simple actions could result in real savings for consumers. If you are a credit card customer, there is no need to wait until you are contacted by your provider. Check your credit card statement now and see if your firm, or another, can offer you a better rate. For many of us, this is the biggest spending time of the year, and credit cards are an important part of the market in offering consumers payment choices – but don’t leave yourself paying more than you have to. To support consumers, we have published information on our Consumer Hub with details on what to consider when looking at credit cards.

"The review also highlighted other issues linked to customer services and supports, which is consistent with similar issues we have seen in other reviews this year. Customer service levels in regulated firms will continue to be a priority focus for the Central Bank into 2025. There is a lot firms can do a lot at a practical level to make improvements to deliver the service consumers rightly expect."
 
Last edited:
That's horrific.

Not alone that such a large number are paying rates in excess of 23%, but the very fact that 23% is somehow to be regarded as "acceptable". Such a gap in people's financial education/understanding.
 
As for the 23% rate, that's far too high, when we're tagged to EU cost of funds etc.

I know that credit card borrowing is intended to be short term, and designed to discourage people from borrowing for the longer term, but it's often those with few options, that end up with big, unpaid, credit card bills... they need greater protection, even if it is high risk lending for the card providers (they just need to stop giving excessive limits, if they want to reduce their overall risk).
 
The CC APR is almost certainly of academic, er, interest to many and maybe most consumers who simply use their cards as a cashflow management tool and clear the balance before interest charges accrue. Anybody who uses a CC for longer term borrowing (other than where there's a zero or low rate for balance transfers etc.) really needs to address that bad habit.
 
Sorry folks. I misunderstood the original article and thought that the credit card rates were illegal but the limits apply to new credit cards only.

I have deleted a few posts based on my misleading initial post.

Brendan
 
There is no harm in the CB highlighting this issue, but it would be better if they also fried some of the bigger fish like unnecessarily/unfairly high mortgage rates (particularly for "vulture fund prisoners") that most likely cost many more consumers a lot more money than high CC interest rates.
 
Back
Top