T
tobo
Guest
I note the topic entitled 'G string post moved' has been locked out for further contributions after criticism was posted there about the decision to 'move' the topic.
I did not see any of the original G string postings and so cannot comment on what was contained there. What concerns me however is the following:
a) Why say it has been 'moved' when as far as I can see it has been 'removed'
b) Burgessbrendan said:-
Who is 'we'? and how was it established what 'we' thought?
c) Who makes the decision to censor postings/topics on AAM and by what criteria??
d) Why was the decision made to lock out the topic 'G string post moved' so that no further comment could be made? and by whom?
e) Whatever happened to the concept of Free Speech? In my opinion no post should be considered for removal from AAM unless it might fairly be considered to be grossly offensive to the majority of reasonably minded individuals, or otherwise considered unlawful or defamatory. Even then, criticism of the decision to remove should be tolerated without further censorship.
f) I believe it is time for a full blown debate about what I perceive to be an increasing amount of intolerance to contributors and their opinions, shown by the 'clique' who run/manage/control/moderate the AAM site. There is a danger that this site might ultimately lose credibility unless this tendency is curbed by greater democratisation and a charter that protects free speech and expression of views.
I did not see any of the original G string postings and so cannot comment on what was contained there. What concerns me however is the following:
a) Why say it has been 'moved' when as far as I can see it has been 'removed'
b) Burgessbrendan said:-
we are actually proud of the general tone of AAM, even on Letting Off Steam
Who is 'we'? and how was it established what 'we' thought?
c) Who makes the decision to censor postings/topics on AAM and by what criteria??
d) Why was the decision made to lock out the topic 'G string post moved' so that no further comment could be made? and by whom?
e) Whatever happened to the concept of Free Speech? In my opinion no post should be considered for removal from AAM unless it might fairly be considered to be grossly offensive to the majority of reasonably minded individuals, or otherwise considered unlawful or defamatory. Even then, criticism of the decision to remove should be tolerated without further censorship.
f) I believe it is time for a full blown debate about what I perceive to be an increasing amount of intolerance to contributors and their opinions, shown by the 'clique' who run/manage/control/moderate the AAM site. There is a danger that this site might ultimately lose credibility unless this tendency is curbed by greater democratisation and a charter that protects free speech and expression of views.