I agree that they should be an alternative to income tax. We need to reduce our taxes on wealth creation and slightly increase our taxes on wealth retention. The current system suits me but it's unfair.Well if it were an alternative to income taxes, yeah, I'd reluctantly concede that you have a point. But this is Ireland, the public has endless demands for government to spend money on stuff for them, and government's instinct is always towards mission creep, so if we were to get more property taxes, it'd inevitably be as an addition to current taxes rather than a replacement for them.
So, no thank you, we're highly taxed enough as it is. Don't be encouraging them!
Well by saying the public demands has endless demands for the government to spend money on stuff for them, totally wrong statement,But this is Ireland, the public has endless demands for government to spend money on stuff for them, and government's instinct is always towards mission creep, so if we were to get more property taxes, it'd inevitably be as an addition to current taxes rather than a replacement for them.
So, no thank you, we're highly taxed enough as it is. Don't be encouraging them!
Well by saying the public demands has endless demands for the government to spend money on stuff for them, totally wrong statement,
I don't agree with you it is the public endless demands that are driving up the need for additional taxes it is away simpler than that,
Irish Government for the last 30 years have been taking in one EURO and promising to give back two for the past 30 years they achieved this by borrowing large amounts money,
EU rules mean they cannot do this anymore,
Direct work payroll of 100000 the employee gets around 56K and the Government gets 44K or 44%
Total tax take on payroll of 100000 is 44%
Total tax take on payroll of 50000 is 38%
Direct Work payroll of 100000 the marginal tax take including income tax prsi and usc is around 63%,
Direct Work payroll of 50000 the marginal tax take including income tax prsi and usc is around 48%
Direct Work payroll of 50000 the employee gets around 31k and the Government gets around 19K or 38%
So, no thank you, we're highly taxed enough as it is. Don't be encouraging them!
But the reason they've been taking in one euro and giving back ... is because of the endless demands for the government to spend money on X, Y, Z and Irish governments inability to say no.Well by saying the public demands has endless demands for the government to spend money on stuff for them, totally wrong statement,
I don't agree with you it is the public endless demands that are driving up the need for additional taxes it is away simpler than that,
Irish Government for the last 30 years have been taking in one EURO and promising to give back two for the past 30 years they achieved this by borrowing large amounts money,
EU rules mean they cannot do this anymore,
Direct work payroll of 100000 the employee gets around 56K and the Government gets 44K or 44%
Total tax take on payroll of 100000 is 44%
Total tax take on payroll of 50000 is 38%
Direct Work payroll of 100000 the marginal tax take including income tax prsi and usc is around 63%,
Direct Work payroll of 50000 the marginal tax take including income tax prsi and usc is around 48%
Direct Work payroll of 50000 the employee gets around 31k and the Government gets around 19K or 38%
Like it or not no matter what political party or parties are in power Wealth retention is going to get hammered one way or another,
Also, I'm not really clear on how property taxes reduce volatility in house prices... my first instinct is that's a bit tenuous. I don't see how higher property taxes would have reduced volatility over the last 5 years in Ireland in any appreciable way. Can someone summarise the basis for that concept?
Also, we are basing our property taxes on property prices, if property prices are volatile what does that do to the taxes?
Tax on Direct work in Ireland is high when you compared to what you get in return,Overall, taxes are not high in Ireland. This is well established.
Now, people might feel they don't get good services for the middling amount of taxes paid here, okay.
Also, the top MTR starts at 35k approx, that may be one reason why some people think taxes are high here.
All the main parties have spent the last 30 years trying to outdo one another at election time with more goodies that we do not need to pay for,But the reason they've been taking in one euro and giving back ... is because of the endless demands for the government to spend money on X, Y, Z and Irish governments inability to say no.
An annual tax of €1500 or €2500 might.Yes, I agree.
An annual 500 tax on a house worth 400k is hardly going to affect people's decisions??
How though? Can you give us an example scenario of how higher property taxes could affect people's decisions that feed into the level property prices go up and down?An annual tax of €1500 or €2500 might.
That's the level is should be at, but with a corresponding reduction in marginal tax rates.
An income tax band of around 28% om incomes between €35k and €70k would be good.
USC should be charged on all income. Maybe they could rename it, call it a Universal Social Charge... oh, wait...
No, other than the report I quoted in my first post. I agree that they don't show evidence to support their conclusion. In my view property tax would depress the value of houses slightly, would broaden the tax base, be a more stable source of revenue than income or transaction taxes and move a small amount that broadened tax base away from wealth creation and onto wealth retention.How though? Can you give us an example scenario of how higher property taxes could affect people's decisions that feed into the level property prices go up and down?
I haven't thought this troughNo, other than the report I quoted in my first post. I agree that they don't show evidence to support their conclusion. In my view property tax would depress the value of houses slightly, would broaden the tax base, be a more stable source of revenue than income or transaction taxes and move a small amount that broadened tax base away from wealth creation and onto wealth retention.
I haven't thought this troughNo, other than the report I quoted in my first post. I agree that they don't show evidence to support their conclusion. In my view property tax would depress the value of houses slightly, would broaden the tax base, be a more stable source of revenue than income or transaction taxes and move a small amount that broadened tax base away from wealth creation and onto wealth retention.
I haven't thought this troughNo, other than the report I quoted in my first post. I agree that they don't show evidence to support their conclusion. In my view property tax would depress the value of houses slightly, would broaden the tax base, be a more stable source of revenue than income or transaction taxes and move a small amount that broadened tax base away from wealth creation and onto wealth retention.
I haven't thought this troughNo, other than the report I quoted in my first post. I agree that they don't show evidence to support their conclusion. In my view property tax would depress the value of houses slightly, would broaden the tax base, be a more stable source of revenue than income or transaction taxes and move a small amount that broadened tax base away from wealth creation and onto wealth retention.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?