Can I give tenants a discount of the amount increased by rent review?

A

Arnie Hammer

Registered User
Messages
42
I have tenants in my apartment for a little over a year at €2,000 pcm. Rents in the area were hit by Covid in 2020 but properties are like hen's teeth now and I would get €2,300 now without difficulty.

The RTB rent calculator is saying I can up the rent by 2.5% or €50. I don't want to do so as they are good tenants. On the other hand it's an RPZ so if I don't increase I'll be stuck at a lower rent for the next tenant or if I want to sell up down the road. The complex is mainly rented and most properties that change hands seem to be to other landlords.

So I was wondering about the following. I notify the tenant of an increase in rent of 2.5% using the RTB template. At the same time I tell them that the increase would be offset by a "discount" of the same amount. They would pay me rent of €2,050 per month and I would make a transfer of €50 back to them separately.

The rent review would be in writing, discussions about "discount" would be in person and I would reserve the right to withhold it at any point.

Is this reasonable? Legal? Are there tax implications? I have a management agent in place whose advice I'd need to seek as well.
 
A €50 per month discount every month sounds both hooky and an obvious attempt to circumvent the law. I'd suggest perhaps increasing the rent as allowed and giving them some vouchers, for much the same overall value but not as a quid pro quo, 2 or 3 times a year.
 
Another option might be to increase the rent but include some common services, for instance provide broadband (~€50/month). You could include TV the year after if you're doing it again. TV license, contents insurance, electricity/gas if you really trust them not to abuse it. These kinds of things are sometimes included when renting, so it's less hooky looking.
 
Could you increase the rent but apply a 'lease renewal' discount? When you factor in the normal costs associated with finishing with one tenant and taking on new ones including letting agent fees, void time between leases and possibly cleaning, decorating or new mattresses, there is certainly a benefit to the landlord when the sitting tenants renew, and which could justifiably be passed on to them.
 
Thanks for all the answers.

T McGibney said:
A €50 per month discount every month sounds both hooky and an obvious attempt to circumvent the law.
Click to expand...

But what law is being broken here? If I was obliging tenants to pay me an extra €50 a month that's clearly a breach of rent control law but not sure how a discount would be.

Thirsty said:
Increase the rent & allow a one month rebate say for December.
Click to expand...
It's a good idea but I can only increase rent by 2.5% so I won't be giving them 8% back at the end of the year.


paper-folder said:
Could you increase the rent but apply a 'lease renewal' discount?
Click to expand...

Maybe I could do this. But I think the lease renews automatically and it's become a Part 4 tenancy.


Zenith63 said:
Another option might be to increase the rent but include some common services, for instance provide broadband (~€50/month).
Click to expand...

That's a good idea! At the same time I don't want the hassle of being the account holder, but it sounds best.


How would this work for tax purposes, would the broadband cost just be an allowable expense? So assuming I increase the rent by as much to cover the cost of broadband my taxable profit just stays the same, right?
 
Arnie Hammer said:
How would this work for tax purposes, would the broadband cost just be an allowable expense? So assuming I increase the rent by as much to cover the cost of broadband my taxable profit just stays the same, right?
Click to expand...

What expenses are allowed?

This page outlines the expenses you can deduct from your taxable rental income
www.revenue.ie www.revenue.ie

Allowable expenses include: cost of any service or goods you provide that are not repaid by your tenant (such as electricity, central heating, telephone, service charges, water and refuse collection).​

 
Why go to the hassle and a clear attempt to circimvent the RPZ law?

You don't have to increase the rent every year, and the cap of 2% per annum is just that, per annum and calculated since the last review. If you don't increase this year you don't re-fix the maximum rent allowed.
 
Leo said:
You don't have to increase the rent every year, and the cap of 2% per annum is just that, per annum and calculated since the last review.
Click to expand...
Thanks really important, thanks. I had in mind the old 4%-at-a-time rule but that seems gone now.

So suppose I leave the rent unchanged for the next four years. For sake of argument 2021-2026 HICP increases 10%. I can still increase by 10% in 2026. Same would go for a new tenancy at any point if existing tenants leave me - either 2% pa pro rata or HICP increase, whichever is lower.

So the only way the theoretical maximum rent achievable can "fall behind" is if I don't impose the maximum increase possible at any point when I carry out the rent review, right?
 
Arnie Hammer said:
So the only way the theoretical maximum rent achievable can "fall behind" is if I don't impose the maximum increase possible at any point when I carry out the rent review, right?
Click to expand...
Yes, unless of course they infroduce further legislation that might limit such increases, but I havn't seen any suggestion they might consider that.
 
if your rent is €2000 and the tenant pays you €1800 and doesn't pay anymore, what's the difference? You declare rental income of €1800. If anyone asks, the amount on the details/registration with the RTB is €2000. You are not dogy tax or doing anything illegal.

I don't see any issues whatsoever in applying the rental increase to €2,050 say and telling the tenants to continue to pay €2000 regardless.

I see no difference with this notion of giving them the month of December for free. If they pay €2050 then you pay tax on the basis of rental income eahc month of €2050. If you decide to gift them €50 a month back, or €600 a year, that's under the annual gift threshold of €3,000 but you are declaring that you are receiving €600 in rental income which you are not, so you will be approximately €300 in additional income tax as a result of doing this method.
 
PebbleBeach2020 said:
I don't see any issues whatsoever in applying the rental increase to €2,050 say and telling the tenants to continue to pay €2000 regardless.
Click to expand...
I don't think the tenants would be too happy with this as they might think I was coming to look for rent arrears.

Anyway @Leo has settled the issue for me. I wont be carrying out any rent review any time soon. I had a bad experience with last tenants and the best tenant is one who pays up every month so I'll let sleeping dogs lie.
 
So true. Rules change and landlords get caught out if they don't increase when they can. Nothing to do with excellent tenants, that's just the way the system is for the past few years.

Can landlords give an early payment discount? I've seen lease agreements with late payment fees or admin charges for unpaid standing orders, so why not a discount if rent is in the landlords bank a few days or a week before it's due.

Are there Revenue implications?
 
How does that work?

If the agreed rent notified to the RTB is €2000 and the tenant gets a 2% discount for early payment then landlord gets €1960. Which amount is reported for tax, the charge or the receipt?

As far as RPZ is concerned, do you mean that the next rent review would be based on the amount received rather than the registered rent? Does that happen when a tenant has unpaid rent, that a future rent review is based on what the tenant actually paid.
 
Last edited:
Leo said:
You can, but for the purposes of RPZ legislation the discounted rate is what you'll be bound by.
Click to expand...
Are you certain about that? do you have a link?

I've given a 'month free' discount in the past where tenant has agreed to do deep clean/ garden work, certainly never said anything to RTB about it.
 
Leo said:
You can, but for the purposes of RPZ legislation the discounted rate is what you'll be bound by.
Click to expand...
I can't see anything in Part 3 of the Residential Tenancies Act that makes this explicit one way or the other.

If a valid rent review has been served and the tenant in situ hasn't challenged it then surely that is the anchoring rent for the purposes of a new tenancy, no? If a discount is small and discretionary then would the landlord be legally bound by it for setting a new rent?

In any case in practical terms it would be very difficult to for the RTB and/or a new tenant to challenge a landlord once they produce a valid historical rent review set in line with the correct parameters.

The tax is another question and shouldn't be confused here.
 
NoRegretsCoyote said:
I can't see anything in Part 3 of the Residential Tenancies Act that makes this explicit one way or the other.
Click to expand...
The risk (and it is a small one) is that the tenant reports the rents paid to the RTB if you ever tried to increase the rent. I can't see the RTB accepting that a notional rent that only exists on paper and is not matched by the actual rental payments is the actual rent.

There's even a lower risk that at some point the RTB will seek access to Revenue records if there is widespread reporting of gaming the system to try circumvent RPZ controls.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top