HI
1 I believe that a builder is accountable to some degree for issues that arise over time up to 7 years. Is this the case?
2 My boiler has gone on the blink after about 3 years, im not sure of the full extent of damage yet but it was serviced in accordance with the builders service requirements after a year.
One would expect that if new cars can come with 3 - 5 year warrantys surely a property must have more than 1 year come back on the builder??
If the builder refuses to cover costs for repairs what are my options?
Can I take this one to the small claim court my self and avoid the hassle of solicitors if the case required.
cheers
C
1. No, theres no obligation for a builder to be liable for faults after whats called the 'defects liability period'. This depends on the contract of course but usually this time span is 6-9 months after completion. I have never heard of this period lasting more than a year
I am quite sure that this is not the case and it may be even up to 12years that there is a level of obligation that work must ahve been completed in a professional manner and the premises fit for habitation.
It is incorrect to suggest a builder only has to stand over work for 12 months ( standar DL period ) where faulty workmanship or materials is concerned.
I am seeking some advice on this as opposed to going under any standard warranty. I happen to know of many faults that arose in the plumbing at an earlier date in other units. This would suggest faulty workmanship and not being fit for the purpose intended.
I am wondering can I look into using the DEFECTIVE PREMISES BILL 1982 to my adavantage and can I do through samll claims if costs are under the threshold ?
I am quite sure that this is not the case and it may be even up to 12years that there is a level of obligation that work must ahve been completed in a professional manner and the premises fit for habitation.
It is incorrect to suggest a builder only has to stand over work for 12 months ( standar DL period ) where faulty workmanship or materials is concerned.
I am seeking some advice on this as opposed to going under any standard warranty.
how are you sure??? what obligation are you referring to? If you are sure why did you ask the original question?
please refer me to this 'correction'..... i could well be wrong with my intrepretation, so id like to be educated on any error.
I am asking because I am sure there is some obligation but I am no legal expert and am asking for clarification on its uses: here is a report ion wahat I refer to. Its defintely one the buildrs do not want Joe Public to know about !! The CIF even lobbied against it, make interesting reading.
[broken link removed]
As I am saying Im pretty sure there is some cover but thye extent and how to go aboput using this legislation I am asking advie on.
Think about it, why would a consumer of a car or a bicycle say, have a longer warranty from defective work and materials than a property. Its insane !! My reading of the attached indicates this was introduced to address this ridiculous scenario.
THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION
AN COIMISIÚN UM ATHCHÓIRIÚ AN DLÍ
(LRC 3 – 1982)
REPORT ON DEFECTIVE PREMISES
IRELAND
The Law Reform Commission,
River House, Chancery Street, Dublin 7
MF 1: Its definitely Irish, I cam e across it as part of my studies.
it sounds like your seeking legal advice....
perhaps this isnt the correct forum for such a request
1. No, theres no obligation for a builder to be liable for faults after whats called the 'defects liability period'. This depends on the contract of course but usually this time span is 6-9 months after completion. I have never heard of this period lasting more than a year
2. unless the boiler is under warrantee from the manufacturer.. which is quite possible... it is then up to you to pay for its replacement. 3 years is very short for a boilers lifespan...
The report is just that - a report. The scheme of a bill attached was never enacted as legislation. A Bill is not part of our legislation until it is enacted by the Houses of the Oireachtas as an Act.I am asking because I am sure there is some obligation but I am no legal expert and am asking for clarification on its uses: here is a report ion wahat I refer to. Its defintely one the buildrs do not want Joe Public to know about !! The CIF even lobbied against it, make interesting reading.
[broken link removed]
As I am saying Im pretty sure there is some cover but thye extent and how to go aboput using this legislation I am asking advie on.
The report is just that - a report. The scheme of a bill attached was never enacted as legislation. A Bill is not part of our legislation until it is enacted by the Houses of the Oireachtas as an Act.
Obligations on builders are limited. Homebond, if applicable, may offer some cover but is likely to be restricted to major structural defects. Other than that, a builder is obliged to comply with the applicable building standards.
Boilers should be serviced annually anyway. Try getting it serviced / repaired.
Thats interesting and extremely laugahble that my car ad shoes have a better warranty for defective labour and materials than a building. ...
On what grounds would you sue? Under what legislation?Thats interesting and extremely laugahble that my car ad shoes have a better warranty for defective labour and materials than a building.
The boiler has been service in line with the aforementioned handover pack.
Getting it replaired? well thats a good idea
Everybody keep saying suing etc will be costly... but I ask, can I take this sort of thing, simply, myslef, to the small claims court ?
cheers all
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?