Borrowers can rely on the distance marketing regulations

[Raging Bull]

The precontractual information requirements and communication of those will provide a better angle of attack.
See SI 853/2004 distance marketing regulations.

Its law and if uncomplied with the contract could be unenforcabale !!

 

[Bronte]

The precontractual information requirements and communication of those will provide a better angle of attack.
See SI 853/2004 distance marketing regulations.

Its law and if uncomplied with the contract could be unenforcabale !!

You've provided case law that says the ECIS can not be relied upon in a contractual dispute. Now you are saying something else? I don't see how a valid contract freely signed, the mortgage acceptance contract, can be set aside.

 

[Bronte]

I see now BB has split the thread.

Firstly you've posted case law to back up the ECIS and quite cleary that court case does not do this, it says the opposite, that the ECIS is not part of the contract.

So now you are posting something else. Have you case law on this?

As far as I'm concerned the law now is what the High court said in the Grant case, you posted.