Bond went bust

C

Clifden

Registered User
Messages
10
Last year I placed money on deposit with a high street bank, I thought! However it turns out that it was placed in an ISTC Bond that went bust and much written about in the papers. Any advice.
 
Last edited:
I placed money on deposit with a high street bank, I thought!
Click to expand...

Why did you think your money was placed in a deposit account? Did you ask for a deposit account product? What documentation were you provided with?
 
Funny that's the second time I heard about this product today. Apparantly, in the other case I heard it was sold as a deposit and the persons concerned intend taking action for a return of their capital.
 
How much did you invest?

You can make a complaint to the Ombudsman if you were misled about the product. I think his limit is €250k.

Brendan
 
You either placed it in a deposit account, or a bond. You cannot have done both as no Irish bank has gone bust.

If a boond, then you signed some documentation. You should have read it. You may have a clmplaint against the seller/institution, but you should bear in mind that you yourself must also bear some responsibility.
 
Level of risk ISTC bond clearly unidentified, I have been watching this story unfold, from news in Sunday Times. I know someone who's lost a lot of money. A few weeks ago Brokers were said to have refunded invetsors who lost in cases where product deemed unsuitable. The ISTC is an unregulated financial institution, seems brokers did not do their homework?
However bottom line, ultimate responsibility lies with Friends First. This bond was given Trustee Status, which means, it was not high risk, so for people or institutions, needing this guarantee, they were duped,
In the case of the OP, check all the small print very carefully. Seems v. strange that you not aware they invested your money in ISTC bonds on your behalf?
 
As well as my previous post, I too was picked by an institution to place money into ISTC. I declined at the time as I thought it was high risk although the institution tried to assure me it was not. Dig your heels in and go for getting your money back
 
Yes, I signed documents. I was assured that the capital was safe. My initial request was for a deposit account. The broker rep has since said that they thougt it was secure.
 
There ws no mention of where it was going except that the capital was safe as I instructed!
 
Thanks for your reply. Yes I was also assured that the deposit was secure. The local branch are saying that its out of their hands.
 
I have been in regular communication with the local First Active branch that sold the policy but they are claiming that they, locally, were innocent as regards knowledge of the risk.
 
Friends First are resolutely not offering any compensation, being of the opinion that if there was a lack of information to investors, that was the responsibility of the seller.

However, some intermediaries have refunded investors themselves, so I'd suggest that this is the route you should pursue. See [broken link removed].

In the first instance, make a written complaint to First Active requesting a return of your original investment plus interest, on the grounds that you were not informed of the risk involved and were of the belief that your money had been placed on deposit. If you are not satisfied, take your complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman.
 
Clifden said:
I have been in regular communication with the local First Active branch that sold the policy but they are claiming that they, locally, were innocent as regards knowledge of the risk.
Click to expand...

Forget this distinction between FA locally and FA head office, and don't let them away with playing that internal blame game. Your complaint is against FA as an organisation.

If the head office guys didn't understand the risk, they shouldn't have been selling the product. If the local guys didn't understand the risk, they shouldn't have been selling the product.
 
Hi, I work for an investment company and we sell our products through brokers and it is up to the brokers to explain the product and they have to write the client a letter saying why the product is suitable, not clear on what the 'broker rep' is but the broker themselves have missold a product but as mentioned before you have to accept some of the blame as you obviously did not read any of the documents issued by the company who provide the product such as 'the value of your investment may fall as well as rise' etc therefore implying it was not capital proctected. There are strict laws surrounding the selling of products now and if you can prove it was missold fair enough although usually it is more obvious cases which win large awards with Ombudsman e.g. a 75 year old being sold a 10 year investment bond etc and they recovered some but not all of the money.
 
tink, Strict laws about selling products -- what a joke. The entire structure of selling investment products in this country is a farce. The matter of bonuses for lump sum investments, commissions on sale, annual commissions, management charges is a complete mystery to those that are investing. And as for the best or right deal, it boils down to basically how loud the investor shouts. And please don't try and tell me it is any different.

Look at clifdens case -- dealt with a high street name and is been pushed between head office and branch office. What a charade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top