Bank is trying to defraud me!

Status
Not open for further replies.

ShelaghD

Registered User
Messages
11
Ok, let me just first say, I am in no way seeking legal advice. I would just like to get people's reactions to this scenario, and would like to know if any similar cases have happened before.

Anyway, my story. In August 2010 I got an 8,000 euro loan from the bank for college. As far as I can remember, I never signed a credit agreement, but I agreed orally with the bank manager to come back in to the bank in August 2011 to agree a repayment schedule. In hindsight, that sounds crazy, but that's what happened. I didn't know the bank manager at all. The reason the general manager dealt with the loan was because the loans manager was on holidays.

I received the 8k into my current account and spent it over the course of the year on college. Fast forward to August 2011, the bank contacted me saying I am in default of my loan and need to bring my repayments up to speed. I replied saying no problem but I don't know what the situation is. I asked what are the terms of my loan repayment, because I don't have a credit agreement, if one was ever signed in the first place. The bank responded that there was a credit agreement signed but they are unable to locate it for the moment but will look for it and get back to me. For the next 6 months more or less, the bank kept sending me letters telling me I'm missing payments, and each time I asked them what the situation is with the existence of a credit agreement, they told me they will let me know. For the duration of these exchanges, I've been living in Germany, and I still am.

They eventually let me know that they are unable to locate a copy of our credit agreement and asked me to call in to the bank when I can to arrange a repayment schedule. I called in at Christmas just gone when I was back home. Before I did, I got legal advice from 2 different solicitors. They both told me that in the absence of a written credit agreement, the bank will have severe difficulties enforcing the loan agreement in court. They also told me it is a bizarre set of circumstances and a severe oversight on the part of the bank.

So when I went into the bank to arrange a repayment schedule, I told them I was willing to pay back the principal of the loan but I wasn't prepared to pay back any interest. I know some people would see that as very cheeky, but that's a different discussion. The loans manager told me that she doesn't have the authority to agree to that but will pass on the request to her superiors. We didn't sign anything on that day or come to an agreement. We agreed that further co-operation would be through the post as I was going back to Germany after Xmas.

Fast forward to Friday when I get a letter from the loans manager. She tells me they have located my credit agreement, and lo and behold a copy of it is attached. This is where it gets interesting. The credit agreement is signed on behalf of the bank by the loans manager, even though I'm 99.9% sure she wasn't involved in my loan application process back then because she was on holidays, it was the general manager who I met with everytime.

Also, the credit agreement states that the 8,000 euro is to be repaid within 1 year of drawing down the money. So in other words, the money is to be repaid before my college year was up (it was a full calendar year in college). The repayment details state that it is to be repaid in one instalment of 8,000 to repay the capital, and then 4 quarterly instalments of the interest applicable. It is then signed both by myself, and by my father as a guarantor. I am 99.9% sure my father never came into the bank with me about that loan.

Now, I am 100% sure I never signed that credit agreement. It would defeat the purpose of me asking for a loan for college, to have to pay it back when I was still in college, and not working.

The signatures of both myself and my father on the credit agreement look genuine. I suspect they copied and pasted them from a previous credit agreement I had with them in 2008 where my father went guarantor for a much smaller loan.

So, what are your thoughts on this? I seem to remember a similar case where AIB fraudulated a married couple's mortgage agreement about a year or so ago. Does anyone have any experience of similar stories?

Regards,
Shelagh.
 
I have absolutely no expertise in this field - but if you didnt sign a contract to pay back the loan (if im reading your post right) you cant be expected to pay back the money.

OP 1 - 0 Bank
 
I have absolutely no expertise in this field - but if you didnt sign a contract to pay back the loan (if im reading your post right) you cant be expected to pay back the money.

OP 1 - 0 Bank

Why not?

She got the loan? There is no dispute over that.

The only dispute is over the repayment terms. If they are reasonable, she should repay the loan.

Of course, there should be a written contract. But she applied for a loan and agreed the terms, orally, with the manager.

The heading is misleading. It seems to me that the OP is trying to defraud the bank.

Brendan
 
Is that possible? Surely one would know the difference between a genuine signature written with a pen from one that is photocopied.

I would think the same thing. They sent me a photocopy of their version, apparently. I haven't been able to see their original copy, if indeed they would show it to me.

I have absolutely no expertise in this field - but if you didnt sign a contract to pay back the loan (if im reading your post right) you cant be expected to pay back the money.

OP 1 - 0 Bank

That is effectively what I've been told by 2 solicitors, 1 specialising in banking issues, and also several people working in credit unions/banks. That's not why I'm posting this here though.

Why not?

She got the loan? There is no dispute over that.

The only dispute is over the repayment terms. If they are reasonable, she should repay the loan.

Of course, there should be a written contract. But she applied for a loan and agreed the terms, orally, with the manager.

The heading is misleading. It seems to me that the OP is trying to defraud the bank.

Brendan

Come off it, I'm not trying to defraud the bank. If you can point to a relevant section of a criminal Act and show me where I am in breach, I will accept your point. Until then, I think the bank is trying to defraud me.

As I said, I've obtained legal advice from a few sources. I didn't have to play ball, I could have gone down the strict legal route and refused to pay back anything. I offered to repay the capital without interest, that clearly irritated the bank and so they've produced this false document. Yet, you think I'm the one who is committing fraud?

Anyway, I'm trying to focus this thread on the issue of a fraudulent credit agreement. I think it's quite shocking.
 
You've only seen a photocopy of the agreement? You need to see the original, it might help determine if they are your actual original signatures or photocopied ones. You're in Germany, would your father be able to go in and look at the original?
 
The courts have already set a precedent in a Court Case against the BoI where a customer's signatures were Digitised and the Court ruled against the Bank and made the Bank write the Loan off. I have a case with another Bank for a larger amount where the Bank suddenly said I requested an Interest Only Mortgage which I did not. They state as in your case, that the original form has gone missing and is not countersigned. It has cost me 000s, but I refuse to be defrauded either.
 
Why don't you tell the bank, you never signed one, neither did your father, and not for one year.
 
You are right. It seems highly implausible that the bank would lend you the money without any T&C's other than a rough agreement to return at the end of college and agree terms some repayment schedule. You also don't strike me as a person who would have agreed to such a loose arrangement where no interest amount even got a mention at the outset. By accepting the money into your current account you entered into some contract to repay it. Rationally I would imagine a court would feel the onus was on you to repay it, and as such loans always attract interest it is reasonable and credible that the bank apply it.You might have difficulty with a court in any event on this alone. They are likely to find for the bank. Can both you and your father swear that no such loan agreement were ever entered into? You could take your chances in court, but morally and legally it sounds like a road to nowhere.
 
If there was no written agreement surely the loan is in breach of the Consumer Credit Act?

I would ask to see both the agreement in question and the previous agreement which was signed by your father. You should be able to see if it is a cut and paste job.
 
By accepting the money into your current account you entered into some contract to repay it.

without an agreement then how is it any different from when someone gifts money into your account which they can do without your consent so long as they fill in a lodgement slip etc or for example if someone lodges money into your account accidentally ? There have been a few threads in the past concerning the case where money is accidentally lodged into an account with a similar account number.
 
The original question posed by OP is was the Bank trying to defraud him/her.
The allegation of fraud is based on an agreement which the OP disputes was signed by him/her and by the guarantor. I.e. that both signatures were forged.
The Bank will likely deispute that claim.
As I would see it thre are 2 possible solutions to this issue.
1. OP to persist with the claim that the agreement is a forgery, in which case the matter is likely to go to Court. This is a risky strategy as the allegation of forgery against the Bank is a very serious matter & if case goes against the Bank will have severe consequences for all concerned. I.e. If the Bank are not fully sure that this document is genuine they are unlikely to progress to Court. However, if they are confident that the document is genuine, then they have the capability to defend this case and both OP and guarantor will be substantially out of pocket.

2. Attempt to reach an agreement with the Bank that is fair to both parties; This will probably entail putting in a formal compliant to the Bank, specfying the exact details of the case and the protracted Bank response to requests for a copy of the loan agreement. Dispute over the genuineness of the loan agreement can also be raised. You can well make the point that you are agreeable to pay back the capital amount of the loan but not the interest. If the Bank come back with a reasonable agreement then you can consider it. If you feel that their proposed solution is not equitqble, you can complain to the FSO.
However, if the case does progress to Court the main loser could be your father, if the case goes against you, as he is resident here and would be held jointly liable for the loan plus interest, plus costs. Make sure that you keep him fully informed of your intentions re this issue.
 
The signatures of both myself and my father on the credit agreement look genuine. I suspect they copied and pasted them from a previous credit agreement I had with them in 2008 where my father went guarantor for a much smaller loan.

Does your father remember signing the agreement?

Did you ask your father at the time if he would sign the agreement or guarantee it?

Forgery of your signatures would be very serious.

It still doesn't exempt you from paying the loan and reasonable interest on it.
 
You've only seen a photocopy of the agreement? You need to see the original, it might help determine if they are your actual original signatures or photocopied ones. You're in Germany, would your father be able to go in and look at the original?

That might be an idea, thanks.

The courts have already set a precedent in a Court Case against the BoI where a customer's signatures were Digitised and the Court ruled against the Bank and made the Bank write the Loan off. I have a case with another Bank for a larger amount where the Bank suddenly said I requested an Interest Only Mortgage which I did not. They state as in your case, that the original form has gone missing and is not countersigned. It has cost me 000s, but I refuse to be defrauded either.

Was this the AIB case about the property as security on a loan? I just read the article today. Do you have any more info on the case? Even the name of it?

The original question posed by OP is was the Bank trying to defraud him/her.
The allegation of fraud is based on an agreement which the OP disputes was signed by him/her and by the guarantor. I.e. that both signatures were forged.
The Bank will likely deispute that claim.
As I would see it thre are 2 possible solutions to this issue.
1. OP to persist with the claim that the agreement is a forgery, in which case the matter is likely to go to Court. This is a risky strategy as the allegation of forgery against the Bank is a very serious matter & if case goes against the Bank will have severe consequences for all concerned. I.e. If the Bank are not fully sure that this document is genuine they are unlikely to progress to Court. However, if they are confident that the document is genuine, then they have the capability to defend this case and both OP and guarantor will be substantially out of pocket.

2. Attempt to reach an agreement with the Bank that is fair to both parties; This will probably entail putting in a formal compliant to the Bank, specfying the exact details of the case and the protracted Bank response to requests for a copy of the loan agreement. Dispute over the genuineness of the loan agreement can also be raised. You can well make the point that you are agreeable to pay back the capital amount of the loan but not the interest. If the Bank come back with a reasonable agreement then you can consider it. If you feel that their proposed solution is not equitqble, you can complain to the FSO.
However, if the case does progress to Court the main loser could be your father, if the case goes against you, as he is resident here and would be held jointly liable for the loan plus interest, plus costs. Make sure that you keep him fully informed of your intentions re this issue.

This is the thing. I am genuinely of the belief that the bank faked this document. But because I am a mere individual, and they are a bank, they have the upper hand, to say the least. There is no balanced playing field here. I'm forced to put everything on the line and risk incurring huge expense just to try and expose the truth. It's a sad state of affairs.

Yes, I would not drop my father in it without letting him know what I will do.
 
Does your father remember signing the agreement?

Did you ask your father at the time if he would sign the agreement or guarantee it?

Forgery of your signatures would be very serious.

It still doesn't exempt you from paying the loan and reasonable interest on it.

No, he doesn't remember signing it, but I wouldn't really use that as a basis for believing it's fake, even if he signed it, it was a couple of years ago and he wouldn't be 100% certain.

As regards me being exempt from paying the loan and reasonable interest on this, a handful of people have said this to me. That is a different question which I didn't want to discuss here. Anyway, now that we're on it, none of these people who told me I was still legally obliged to pay the loan back could point to any legal source i.e. a relevant section of an Act, previous case law or anything like that to back up their assertion that I was still legally obliged to repay the loan. Can you?

As I've said, I have been told my solicitors and some people working in financial institutions that a bank has great difficulties in enforcing an alleged credit agreement in court without written evidence of such. I've been told of specific examples where credit institutions have decided not to pursue an outstanding debt in court because of the absence of a written credit agreement.

Again, I stress, that's not why I'm posting here. I'm only looking for opinions on the related fraudulent document.
 
If there was no written agreement surely the loan is in breach of the Consumer Credit Act?

I would ask to see both the agreement in question and the previous agreement which was signed by your father. You should be able to see if it is a cut and paste job.

It's also in breach of the Statute of Frauds I believe. What part of the Consumer Credit Act is relevant here?
 
You can be sure that "the Bank" did not fake the document. However, it is possible that some misguided individual in the Bank did produce a faked document to cover up the fact that an original could not be located. No Bank would countenance this action and there would be severe consequqnces for any official if it was discovered that such a action had been perpetrated.
You seem genuine in your belief that this document is not genuine and you should therefore address your concerns to the Bank. They, in turn will need to take your complaint seriously and the complaints procedure should ensure that appropriate action is taken to address your concerns.
 
Anyway, now that we're on it, none of these people who told me I was still legally obliged to pay the loan back could point to any legal source i.e. a relevant section of an Act, previous case law or anything like that to back up their assertion that I was still legally obliged to repay the loan. Can you?

Have you checked the bank's terms and conditions, which you accepted when you became a customer? These often contain a catch all designed to cover such a situation as this and the terms are usually not very favourable!
 
Sheelagh

You are missing the point.

You borrowed the money - you are not denying it. The bank did not give you a gift.

You agreed some terms, at least, orally - you are not denying it.

You presumably did not think that you were getting an interest free loan?

So you have a moral obligation to repay the loan.

I am not sufficiently familiar with the CCA. I hope it doesn't say that the penalty for the bank being unable to find the original loan agreement is that the loan is not enforceable.

Brendan
 
It's also in breach of the Statute of Frauds I believe. What part of the Consumer Credit Act is relevant here?


I am not a solicitor but wouldn't sections 30 and 31 be relevant. Credit agreement and guarantee has to be in writing and signed by the parties. Cooling off period, apr etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top