Bronco Lane
Registered User
- Messages
- 539
I see my local chipper has increased the price of a bag to an even €3 from €2.80. A bit higher than the recent VAT price increase? Not even a few extra thrown in on top.
I see my local chipper has increased the price of a bag to an even €3 from €2.80. A bit higher than the recent VAT price increase? Not even a few extra thrown in on top.
I understand staff costs, overheads, ins, heating, rent, rates, etc, etc, but €3 for a bag of chips is absolutely ridiculous. Same as €3 for a cup of tea or coffee is extortion.
On what basis is it extortion? No doubt you're referring to all the Prosches and Ferraris that owners of chip shops round the country swan around in, the fruits of the overblown profits from their poor gouged customers. Do you have even the slightest idea of what it takes to run a business like that, or the economics that underpin it?
I would determine it costs me aprox 15c to make quite a large bag which includes all staff costs, utensils, property tax, salt/vinegar, condiments, raw materials, production costs, seating, and whatever else you might care to mention.
..... who suggested I fry them myself. He'll be delighted to know I do just that and I would determine it costs me aprox 15c to make quite a large bag which includes all staff costs, utensils, property tax, salt/vinegar, condiments, raw materials, production costs, seating, and whatever else you might care to mention.
'...you are doing very well if you come out with a 5% net profit...'
I was talking to a coffee shop owner about the impending VAT rise.His accountant told him to pass it on or go out of business.
I thought at the time that this was rubbish,but if the net margin is only 5%...
Ha ha, been in the business and many others and not on the fringes like yourself
Look, i've actually given you a very basic outline of a few items
if that doesn't fit in with your take on things then fine
Next time you have a bag of chips, think of the small potato that's in there and the €3 you've given for it. Oh yeah, the cost, the cost, the cost of putting it into that bag? I forgot that.
'...you are doing very well if you come out with a 5% net profit...'
I was talking to a coffee shop owner about the impending VAT rise.His accountant told him to pass it on or go out of business.
I thought at the time that this was rubbish,but if the net margin is only 5%...
The VAT decrease was introduced on a temporary basis. If any business closes simply because of the VAT increase, they should have closed before now before they have been basically operating on a subsidy by the taxpayer and that is not a sustainable business. Any business should simply pass on the increase if they can't absorb the cost in their margins. If customers stop buying cups of coffee because they are paying 13.5% VAT instead of 9% VAT, then there is a bigger problem.
Shouldn't the question be whether 13.5% VAT or 9% VAT will bring in more revenue from the sector as a whole (i.e. not just VAT, but also considering rates, wages, profits)? If 13.5% VAT leads to reduced demand and businesses closing, then there will be less money flowing into the state coffers... people may switch to nespresso coffee at home or airfryer chips and put the saved money towards a sun holiday. That's not a rhetorical IF btw.
What basis do you have for saying that? I recall when it was introiduced the minister made it clear that the response of the sector would be watched and if it wasn't passed on it would be reversed. Whilst I've no doubt specific examples can be found where it wasn't, in the main it was passed on, and indeed more than passed on in many instances, with the cost of dining out in particular falling considerably with all sorts of special deals being introduced. The stimulus worked: employment grew in one of the few sectors that had the ability to do so across the country, all at a time of significant recession. The question now is whether there will be a net increase in income to the government. This is highly questionable: sales are likely to fall as is employment, both of which will reduce rather than increase tax income (considering all of VAT, PAYE, PRSI and USC).The issue is that the 4.5% decrease was never passed on the customer originally.