S.N.Dipity
Registered User
- Messages
- 16
I have just received a finding against me from the Ombudsman in relation to a complaint about a Banks failure to recover mortgage payments for 6 months.
The Ombudsman's finding was that it was my responsibility to set up a Standing Order on the account despite:
1. Having phoned them on numerous occasions to tell that that no payments were coming out of my account.
2. Never having been asked to (I had given my the details of the account from which payments were to be made to the Bank on a form and assumed this was a Direct Debit mandate as the Mortgage was a variable rate)
3. Not having been told where my account was located (The account was opened in Branch A, managed from Branch B and located in Branch C) so would not have been able to set up a Standing order anyway.
I am now considering appealing the Finding to the High Court as this is the only option to reverse the finding and am just wondering
a) Has anyone on the site any experience of this?
b) Are the costs prohibitive if the Judgement goes against me?
The Ombudsman's finding was that it was my responsibility to set up a Standing Order on the account despite:
1. Having phoned them on numerous occasions to tell that that no payments were coming out of my account.
2. Never having been asked to (I had given my the details of the account from which payments were to be made to the Bank on a form and assumed this was a Direct Debit mandate as the Mortgage was a variable rate)
3. Not having been told where my account was located (The account was opened in Branch A, managed from Branch B and located in Branch C) so would not have been able to set up a Standing order anyway.
I am now considering appealing the Finding to the High Court as this is the only option to reverse the finding and am just wondering
a) Has anyone on the site any experience of this?
b) Are the costs prohibitive if the Judgement goes against me?