Thesearcher
Registered User
- Messages
- 89
Hello,
I’m looking for advice on a flat-roof issue in an apartment building where we own one of the units.
The flat roof has been failing due to ongoing ponding (standing water). The Owners’ Management Company has hired a surveyor and are currently negotiating with a contractor to replace the existing felt roof with a new felt membrane. They have mentioned “creating a fall” to improve drainage, but there is no firm guarantee that ponding will actually be eliminated.
My concern is this:
The original roof lasted only about 10 years before failing, and the consensus from the structural engineer I consulted is that the underlying problem is inadequate fall, leading to pooling. If that isn’t permanently resolved, then replacing felt with more felt seems like a short-term fix. Realistically, we risk ending up in the same position in another decade.
I have suggested looking at alternative solutions such as a roof-over-roof system or a proper redesign of the roof build-up or extra floors. But the OMC is not interested in exploring these options. Their position is that they already have multiple “professionals” advising them. The surveyor, the contractor, and the management company, so they just want to proceed with felt again.
My concern is these professionals will collect their fees, complete a minimal-scope job, and walk away, while the apartment owners will be left with another roof that may only last 10 years despite a huge cost.
Has anyone dealt with something similar?
Is it reasonable to push for:
They have made reference to redress but that doesn't appear to be an option at this point in time.
Any feedback or experience would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
I’m looking for advice on a flat-roof issue in an apartment building where we own one of the units.
The flat roof has been failing due to ongoing ponding (standing water). The Owners’ Management Company has hired a surveyor and are currently negotiating with a contractor to replace the existing felt roof with a new felt membrane. They have mentioned “creating a fall” to improve drainage, but there is no firm guarantee that ponding will actually be eliminated.
My concern is this:
The original roof lasted only about 10 years before failing, and the consensus from the structural engineer I consulted is that the underlying problem is inadequate fall, leading to pooling. If that isn’t permanently resolved, then replacing felt with more felt seems like a short-term fix. Realistically, we risk ending up in the same position in another decade.
I have suggested looking at alternative solutions such as a roof-over-roof system or a proper redesign of the roof build-up or extra floors. But the OMC is not interested in exploring these options. Their position is that they already have multiple “professionals” advising them. The surveyor, the contractor, and the management company, so they just want to proceed with felt again.
My concern is these professionals will collect their fees, complete a minimal-scope job, and walk away, while the apartment owners will be left with another roof that may only last 10 years despite a huge cost.
Has anyone dealt with something similar?
Is it reasonable to push for:
- Guarantees that no pooling will remain after works,
- Manufacturer certification on ponding tolerance, and
- Retention of final payments until after heavy rainfall confirms adequate drainage?
They have made reference to redress but that doesn't appear to be an option at this point in time.
Any feedback or experience would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks