AIB tracker redress

PFS7979

Registered User
Messages
244
hi..
I was left with no option but to sell my house a couple of years ago due to being unable to afford repayments.

Bank have now been in touch to say my case is being reviewed due to failure to offer a tracker rate.

pretty certain i could have kept house if left with tracker.

any thoughts on what to expect here from the bank
 
Did you take out tracker originally?

Were you before or after march 2006?
 
pretty certain i could have kept house if left with tracker.

1) You are being reviewed. But that does not mean that AIB has agreed that you lost your tracker unfairly.
2) If you lost your tracker unfairly the compensation will depend on whether that was the reason you lost your house

Most people who lost their house were paying nothing, so the interest rate was irrelevant. You will get compensation - probably the write off of any mortgage shortfall.

If you were making payments which would have been adequate to cover the correct mortgage repayment, then you will get substantial compensation.

Brendan
 
1) You are being reviewed. But that does not mean that AIB has agreed that you lost your tracker unfairly.
2) If you lost your tracker unfairly the compensation will depend on whether that was the reason you lost your house

Most people who lost their house were paying nothing, so the interest rate was irrelevant. You will get compensation - probably the write off of any mortgage shortfall.

If you were making payments which would have been adequate to cover the correct mortgage repayment, then you will get substantial compensation.

Brendan
we engaged with the bank all way through and paid what we could... kept up full payments for a long time.. years in fact
 
Then you would be in a good position for a good lump of compensation. We won't know the details until it's announced.

But again, it's important to stress that a review might well conclude that you did not lose your tracker unfairly.

Brendan
 
I was left with no option but to sell my house a couple of years ago due to being unable to afford repayments.

pretty certain i could have kept house if left with tracker.

What makes you say you possibly would have been able to keep the house if you had a tracker. While I believe this is true in some cases it will not be true in all cases. For example, the repayments you actually did make to the bank, were they continuous and were they the same amount you would be charged with a tracker?

Also are you going it alone on dealing with AIB or have you consulted an expert?
 
I have full clarity on this now. thanks for your interest in clarifying matters.

this now boils down to them being fair and equitable in their redress scheme. Its made me bitterly angry that we've gone through so much worry over the years and acted in full good faith in paying what we could and cooperating all way through with them. One assumes the PTSB scheme will act as their benchmark.
 
You must not let your anger consume you. It can also blind you to the truth. It's also true to say many people bought homes that were way too expensive and that left them in a very precarious position with repayments if anything at all happened such as a loss of a job, a reduction in pay, a new child, an interest rate increase.
 
with respect, my reaction is based in facts and not assumptions as to our particular circumstances. no need for you to worry about our being "consumed" by anything.

whilst your comments may be true in some circumstances, they are not relevant to ours.

the bank will be in a precarious position if they try to adopt a retrospective credit assessment on the original lend. remember, they lent the money in first instance
 
with respect, my reaction is based in facts and not assumptions as to our particular circumstances. no need for you to worry about our being "consumed" by anything.

whilst your comments may be true in some circumstances, they are not relevant to ours.

the bank will be in a precarious position if they try to adopt a retrospective credit assessment on the original lend. remember, they lent the money in first instance

Hang on. Your reaction isn't based in fact to your particular circumstance. You came here asking whether you should be on a tracker, which is where a portion of your bitterness arises. And the likelihood is that you probably werent entitled to a tracker. And thus will end any issue over redress. Credit assessment wont form part of anything.
 
your right in that I made an initial post here yesterday whilst in the dark on the contractual circumstances.

You have obviously missed my further post this morning, in which I have updated that I am now aware of the contractual position and the status of our review. was entitled to tracker as acknowledged in writing and verbally by the lender.

Curious as to why you are jumping into this discussion, when at 9:47 am i posted a thankyou to some helpful feedback and confirmed that I had successfully established the facts of our position with the lender.

We await proposals from the lender in early months of next year as regard payment
 
Guys

The original poster is clearly does not appreciate hearing anything other than what he wants to hear.

I wouldn't waste any further time with him.

Brendan
 
You mean the one line where you had answered "was Sep 06 and had an initial low fixed rate".? I didnt think it really clarified that you had begun on a tracker. Or did you mean the line where you said you now have full clarity?

It's an internet forum. People get to comment on the matter at whatever time takes their fancy. Nothing stops them from commenting. In the same nothing stops you from just ignoring anything going forward and not feeling then the need to question my motives.

Anyway I digress. o_O
 
really not seeking to waste anybodys time here.

I was thankfully able to establish the facts of our position this morning and made a polite comment to close out my query and express thanks for some useful feedback last night and early this morning.

I've established that details of the lenders redress proposals will be communicated to us in before end of May 17 at the latest.
 
Guys

The original poster is clearly does not appreciate hearing anything other than what he wants to hear.

I wouldn't waste any further time with him.

Brendan
Thanks Brendan, I actually thought you were referring to me. Been difficult few days but having received clarification from the lender this morning I'm much happier. lets see outcome now in coming months.
 
was tongue in cheek peteb.

final comment here: Lender confirmed our account in scope and they are preparing redress offer. this was confirmed this morning
 
Hey well done

Great to hear you're getting it back

Hopefully the rest of us will be equally fortunate
 
Back
Top