lollipop67
Registered User
- Messages
- 15
that is a completely misguided opinion if you are basing that 80% were happy because they didn't bother appealing. The numbers who are heading straight for the high Court are much higher than those who tried the appeals route first.
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander springs to mind.
Personally, I would take a punt down the High Court, liability is not an issue, the bank's will probably settle with you for a higher figure to avoid those horrendously high, High Court legal expenses ( I am a betting man ) that they will be left with if you proceeded down the legal route.
an insurance company will automatically pay out 12,000 euro or more for a whiplash claim, as to legally defend this type of case will cost the insurance company multiples of this figure in legal costs alone.
but if the thought of legal action is discomforting
Solicitor, barristers will be queuing up to do pro bono ono work, as they are guaranteed payment.
Many solicitors and barristers have no understanding at all of mortgages and financial issues.
If someone considers that their compensation is not adequate, they would be far better off going to someone like Padraic Kissane who can advise them far more effectively.
Brendan
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?