2026 British local and regional elections

arbitron

Registered User
Messages
795
7th May will be the English local elections, Welsh parliament elections, and Scottish parliament elections.

It's fascinating talking to people here in England about regional politics - most have no clue anything is happening in the Welsh or Scottish parliaments. They think it's local elections across all of the UK, but it's just England. Most people I've asked are against Scottish independence but they are ambiguous about Ireland. NI unionists either have no idea what English people think about them (or indeed how rarely the English ever think about NI at all) or else they are in complete denial.

English people in general know very little about NI, do not care about the place, and would sever ties if they thought it would mean lower taxes. It's like a toxic relationship where one partner is infatuated but the other one is only sticking around because they don't want to have to do the divorce paperwork and they know it would be a very messy break-up. Annie Wilkes from Misery comes to mind. To make matters worse, my experience is that English people are generally very positive towards the "Southern Irish" but they do not particularly like folks from the North.

Several of the Reform candidates in my local area are immigrants from Europe. People do not seem to see any irony in electing foreign nationals who want to shut down immigration options that they have benefited from. On a weekly basis I encounter Brexiteers still moaning about the restrictions they face when travelling in Europe. I never know what to say to them. And now they are voting for Reform candidates who have EU passports and can skip the queues. Bizarre.

I suspect we will end up with a lot more Green and Reform councillors. The UK Greens are not like the Irish Greens. The Irish Greens are basically LibDems, but the UK Greens act more like PBP/SF. And Reform are just the weirdest collection of over-confident misanthropes. Councils have quite a bit of power and responsibility here so it's worrying.
 
Absolutely lamentable performance by Labour Party in these elections. Starmer goes from weakness to weakness. He says he wont walk away, from which I can only conclude he is a plant to destroy the very existence of the Labour Party in Britain.
 
Last edited:
Starmer's appointment of Harriet Harman as advisor on Women and Girls already appears to have backfired spectacularly. Some very unsavory stuff from her NGO/activist past all over the media today. And when John Cleese and JK Rowling get involved you just know she's going to have a rough time answering questions, attempting to distance herself and defend the indefensible.

You would think Starmer would have played it much safer given his recent troubles with the Mandelson appointment - perhaps he has some kind of bizarre political death-wish

www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/harriet-harman-is-back-and-so-are-her-critics-rbhmq7chl

Harman is not without controversy. Almost immediately after her appointment was announced on Saturday, a historical link to the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) — a pro-paedophile activist group — resurfaced online and among political opponents.
From 1978 to 1982 Harman worked as a legal officer at the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL), predecessor to the campaign group Liberty, which had granted “affiliate” status to PIE in 1975.



 
Last edited:
Most recent polls in the UK now suggest a majority think Brexit was a disaster. Yet the mouthpiece for Brexit - Nigel Farage- is now leading the largest party in local Government and being touted as the next PM.
Do British voters ever learn?
 
Starmer's appointment of Harriet Harman as some kind of advisor on Women and Girls already appears to have backfired spectacularly. Some very unsavory stuff from her NGO/activist past all over the media today.

No. There is 1 article in the Telegraph and 1 in the Times and neither of them are on the front page. Nothing at all in the Guardian, Sun, Daily Mail, GB News, BBC, etc.

The story has been around for over a decade and didn't stop her from holding several high profile positions, including UK Special Envoy for Women and Girls, which she has held for over a year already.

And when John Cleese and JK Rowling get involved you just know she's going to have a rough time answering questions, attempting to distance herself and defend the indefensible.

Harman has been one of the most consequential and effective politicians in the UK for women and girls over the past 50 years. Domestic violence legislation, increasing the number of female politicians, improving childcare, improving paternity and maternity leave, etc. She is the reason it is illegal to discriminate against women breastfeeding in public.

Harman has been a media target for decades. If the likes of Emily Maitlis and Jeremy Paxman didn't faze her, I really doubt she cares about of a pair of celebrities kicking off on Twitter.
 
Well, it looks like adding a couple of septuagenarians as "advisors" to Government isn't going to work out so well.

Hard to see now how Starmer can survive the current upheaval - although he may limp on in the short term.


 
Back
Top