€3m for league of Ireland football academies.

Because of the huge proliferation of 5 a side and floodlight Astro pitches there is a huge number of football players participating in 5 a side , 7 a side and Floodlights Leagues and indeed pickup games , in order to participate in such Leagues and games one does not have to be registered.
If you are to include casual players on one side, you need to do so for all. Regardless, those playing 5-a-side and such are revenue generating for the clubs involved so shouldn't be used as a justification for additional funding for those clubs.
 
Agreed. It puts LOI clubs on a much better footing. And there's a lot of talent and a huge young player community out there. This is a great plan.
 
I have never seen GAA football, hurling or camogie played either in a gym , community hall , small sized Astro pitches or 5 a side pitches .
It’s telling that in any space I played small sided games I’ve seen football goals & basketball hoops but never Gaelic Goalposts , because of it’s physicality GAA football and the preponderance of high balls is totally unsuited to either indoor or small sided Astro pitches and as for Hurling & camogie !
I think it’s obvious that most small sided games are football games played by a huge number of people.
Some junior clubs do indeed have Astro pitches and make a few bob , more power to them but the vast majority of small sided venues are owned by schools , communities, local authorities or private enterprises.
A couple of LOI clubs have artificial pitches but the majority do not .
 
I have never seen GAA football, hurling or camogie played either in a gym , community hall , small sized Astro pitches or 5 a side pitches .
Try a tour around places like Kilkenny where the kids playing on greens or against gable ends is a common site. Regardless, in the context of funding, how are you proposing funding would be allocated to such casual participants?

I think it’s obvious that most small sided games are football games played by a huge number of people.
Most likely, but that is self-funding. It doesn't make any sense to use the numbers participating in such activity to determine what funding should go to a completely unrelated organisation. Where I live, if you were to target funding at numbers playing 5-a-sides on astro, it is the GAA clubs that would get most.
 
My contention is that due to fact that the huge popularity of small sided indoor and Astro football means many more people participate in football than all GAA sports combined not that such casual participants should benefit from Government funding , that would be simply ridiculous.
Indeed Kilkenny is simply over the bridge from us and yes you see kids swinging hurleys all the time although currently their kids aren’t a patch on Waterford’s - the current All Ireland minor champions.
The Kilkenny & district league have 24 Junior clubs catering for adults , those clubs provide 180 schoolboy & schoolgirl teams playing in a multitude of divisions, there are also competitive 5 & 6 a side leagues , leisure leagues & floodlight leagues .
When I was a teenager in Waterford the thought of that many teams and leagues in Kilkenny was simply unthinkable, the spread of football outside the traditional strongholds has been hugely encouraging.
Funding should be confined to LOI clubs , Junior Clubs & Academies .
 
My contention is that due to fact that the huge popularity of small sided indoor and Astro football means many more people participate in football than all GAA sports combined not that such casual participants should benefit from Government funding , that would be simply ridiculous.
Fair enough, but this is a thread on funding, so we shouldn't be talking numbers of casual participants, and funding for organised clubs should be based on their playing numbers .
 
I can bring any doubter here to some GAA clubs that use good indoor facilities for hurling and using goal and points goal-posts and fake grass, I know Assiciation Football clubs have indoor facilities too. Some policing of government grants is needed but the bottom line is the funding is mostly deserved and required. It’s good value to the tax payer too - sporting clubs are saving people from prison, drug abuse, excessive gambling, etc and promoting positive behaviour in our youth. Take the funding away and look at what’s left.
 
I can bring any doubter here to some GAA clubs that use good indoor facilities for hurling and using goal and points goal-posts and fake grass,
The Connacht Dome was hugely popular while it lasted too, even holding inter-county games.
 
Funding for sport that keeps people fit and healthy is money well spent. I don't care what code it goes to. It's an investment in health and wellbeing and probably saves far more in the long run.
 
It'd be good to know what Eamon Dunphy makes of it. I'm paraphrasing one of his declarations:
"You need poverty and dictatorships for great footballers".

:)
 
Back
Top