I guess we better just accept that bond-007 is correct in all cases and ignore what the ICB themselves say and what has been said on AAM anytime anyone asks about the ICB .
Trying to make out the banks keeping track of people's credit history is 'big brother' behaviour is scaremongering and sensationalist-lending money without looking at past behaviour is reckless and not a good basis for the stability of the banking industry.
As I said above, let the OP apply to see their own credit record, although they have already said:
which would certainly seem to suggest that in their case, the ICB has kept their records for more than 2 years.
By all means take it up with the ICB if there is a Data Protection issue-I for one would be interested to hear the outcome.
Trying to make out the banks keeping track of people's credit history is 'big brother' behaviour is scaremongering and sensationalist-lending money without looking at past behaviour is reckless and not a good basis for the stability of the banking industry.
As I said above, let the OP apply to see their own credit record, although they have already said:
Sol7 said:The problem is no lender will give 100% mortgage if you have bad debt, i.e. on the ICB, I'm on the ICB as a result of this.
which would certainly seem to suggest that in their case, the ICB has kept their records for more than 2 years.
By all means take it up with the ICB if there is a Data Protection issue-I for one would be interested to hear the outcome.