Thoughts on the Single Public Service Pension Scheme (SPSPS)

Ent319

Registered User
Messages
96
Analysis of the Single Public Service Pension Scheme

This post puts together some information that might be helpful for public servants on the Single Public Service Pension Scheme (SPSPS). All new entrants to the public service since 2013 will generally be members of the scheme. A handbook containing information about the Single Scheme can be found here: https://singlepensionscheme.gov.ie/for-members/scheme-information/scheme-booklet/

There’s very little information online about the SPSPS. Most members probably aren’t thinking about retirement yet. The general consensus is that Single Scheme members will get a raw deal on retirement compared to public servants on Pre-2013 pensions. This is likely but will not always be the case depending on an individual’s entry grade and the promotions they receive during their career. There’s a few quirks about how the SPSPS works and the tax treatment of individuals on the SPSPS that can, in some cases, lead to them being financially better off vs. post-1995 public servants, particularly at higher salaries and with a bit of luck / savvy investing. I’m deliberately excluding pre-1995 boomers from this post because I’m not quite sure what their situation is re: PRSI and the state pension.

Below are some basic facts about how the single scheme works and the key differences between it and Post-1995 schemes:
  • You earn pension benefits in the single scheme on a career average basis. The amount you contribute to the scheme and the benefits you accrue are determined by your salary at the time your contributions are made. Each contribution you make creates a “block” of pension benefits that you bank. The rate you pay as a contribution is a % of your salary. You’ll earn more pension benefits if you have a larger salary when your contributions are made.
  • Pre-2013 public servants’ pension benefits are determined by their period of service and their final salary. This is very different to the Single Scheme and means members of pre-2013 schemes can increase their pension benefits massively by getting promotions later on in their career.
  • All public servants pay “Additional Superannuation Contribution” (ASC). Members of the Single Scheme pay a lower rate of ASC than Pre-2013 public servants. The rates of ASC are as follows:
    • For SPSPS Members, you pay no ASC on the first 34,500 euros you make, 3.33% on the next 25550 euros, and then 3.5% on all salary after that.
    • Pre 2013 public servants pay no ASC on the first 34,500 euros they make, 10% on the next 25550 euros, and then 10.5% on all salary after that.
  • ASC qualifies for income tax relief at your marginal rate. This will be either 20% or 40%, depending on your salary.
  • All things being equal (length of service, salary), a member of the SPSPS will receive the same pension benefits on retirement as a post 1995+ entrant. After forty years this is 50% of final salary less the value of the state pension + 150% of salary as a lump sum.
  • However, due to the way pay in the public service works via salary scale increments and promotions, all things will generally not be equal between single scheme members and pre-2013 entrants. Someone who gets an ASEC job in the last five years of their career on a pre-2013 pension will be able to increase the value of their pension by hundreds of thousand of euros overnight. This is no longer possible on the Single Scheme. Similarly, someone on the Single Scheme who spends a longer amount of their career on lower grades (CO / EO) will have a lot of catching up to do via AVCs if they get promoted to HEO or AP later on in their career and they want to maximise their pension benefits. The same person on a pre-2013 pension won’t have this issue.
  • Pension benefits banked under the single scheme are uprated and indexed in line with inflation. They are not reduced if there is deflation.
  • The normal retirement age (NRA) for members of the Single Scheme is equivalent to the State Pension Age. Currently this is 66 and will probably rise in the future.
  • If you want to retire earlier than this you can apply for cost-neutral early retirement. This is possible from age 55. If you do this the pension benefits you’ve banked will be reduced. Tables that set out how much your pension benefits will be reduced can be found here: https://singlepensionscheme.gov.ie/circular-18-of-2017/
Here’s where things get a bit more interesting:
  • All things being equal, prior to retirement, a member of the SPSPS with a salary greater than €34,500 will always be financially better off than a post-1995 entrant. This is a natural consequence of the reduced rate of ASC paid by single scheme members. Effectively, the ASC reduction means members of the Single Scheme that earn above €34,500 are paid a greater net salary than post 1995+ entrants.
  • This effect becomes more pronounced the higher the Single Scheme member’s salary becomes because:
    • They pay less ASC overall vs. equivalent pre-2013 high earners
    • The difference in ASC between the two can be invested in AVCs and/or an AVC-PRSA with tax relief by the Single Scheme member.
  • For example:
    • If a public servant on the Single Scheme and a public servant on a pre-2013 scheme were both paid €80,000 for thirty years, their resulting pension benefits on retirement, excluding lump sum, would be €20250 PA. This is not factoring in any actuarial reductions which might be applicable for early retirement. However, the Single Scheme member would have paid €55953 less ASC net after tax relief over the course of their career compared to the pre-2013 public servant.
    • If the Single Scheme member invested the difference in ASC they pay through an AVC, availing of tax relief at their marginal rate, and with assumed growth rates of 7% pa and a 0.5% increase to contributions pa, they could have an AVC pot of circa. €330,000 on retirement (in addition to equivalent benefits under the main scheme to someone that’s pre-2013).
    • If both were paid €100,000 for thirty years, the single scheme member could have a €500,000 AVC pot by investing the ASC difference (€81150 Net)
    • If both were paid €50,000 for thirty years, the AVC pot would be much smaller (Approx €110,000) because there’d only be a €18650 ASC difference.
The Single Scheme has a facility where you can purchase additional benefits on a “cost-neutral” basis. More information can be found here: https://singlepensionscheme.gov.ie/...der-the-single-public-service-pension-scheme/. The main details of this facility are as follows:
  • Benefits can be purchased directly (the purchase facility) or by transfer from revenue approved pension products such as AVCs, PRSAs (the transfer facility).
  • Benefits purchased through the purchase or transfer facility rank on par with benefits ordinarily earned in the scheme, and are inclusive of dependant’s benefits.
  • To be eligible for the purchase facility, you must be a member of the Single Scheme and have:
    • Completed the two year vesting period
    • Have the potential to complete a period of 9 FTE years as a member of the Single Scheme by the time you reach normal retirement age;
  • Normal pension or lump sum can be purchased. Purchase agreements are made on a twelve month basis. Normal pension can be purchased by way of one lump sum payment only.
  • If you cease to be a Scheme Member before nine years have passed, the full cost of all ordinary pension amounts purchased under the purchase facility must be refunded. Money refunded reflects the cost of payment at the time of purchase. Interest is not payable on these refunds (!!!!!!). This doesn't appear to apply for money that has been transferred from another pension product.
  • A calculator to work out how much it would cost to purchase benefits is available here: https://singlepensionscheme.gov.ie/...me-member-purchase-transfer-calculation-tool/
  • In most cases, after playing around on the calculator, it seems the purchase facility allows you to purchase annuities at roughly a 25:1 ratio, meaning you get €1 of pension in retirement for every €25 you spend.
  • If you take cost-neutral early retirement, the benefits you’ve purchased through the purchase facility will be actuarially reduced.
  • If you purchase benefits by way of transfer (e.g. from an AVC, PRSA), you’ll lose any money that brings you over the revenue maximum pension benefit limits.
Conclusions
  • In most cases, pre-2013 public servants will likely do better than Single Scheme members. This is particularly likely to be the case the longer a Single Scheme members spends their career at grades / salary levels before ASC really kicks in.
  • Single Scheme members that enter the public service at higher grades (HEO / AP / PO) and work their way up the ladder quickly might not be much worse off at the end of their career than people in pre-2013 schemes. With good investment choices and favourable market conditions, they might even do better than their colleagues by investing the difference in ASC they pay in a PRSA / AVC and then investing in an ARF or purchasing retirement benefits through the Single Scheme purchase facility.
  • Purchasing benefits through the Single Scheme purchase facility should probably only be considered towards the end of your career, and definitely not earlier than nine years after you’ve been a scheme member. It might not make sense at all, depending on the rate you have to pay. It probably makes more sense for you to invest your money in an AVC, earn interest on the amount you invest (with tax relief) and then consider whether you want to purchase by way of transfer later on in your career.
  • The career average nature of the Single Scheme probably means that you want to start making AVCs very early. Over the course of your career you'll likely receive promotions that drastically increase your maximum pension benefits, but your actual pension benefits will be much lower than the revenue max. If you're an optimist, by investing in AVCs you could essentially "pre-fund" for raises in maximum revenue pension benefits by future promotions. The gap created by the state pension in your benefits likely makes this possible.
 
Last edited:
I've assumed that SPSPS members and pre-2013 people pay pension contributions at the same rate. Also full disclaimer - not someone with a background in finance and the figures provided are intended to be illustrative rather than exact.
 
Thanks for this Ent. As someone who joined the PS in 2018 and will be 65 all too soon I am extremely interested. Are there advisers out there who are knowledgable about this.
 
One thing I didn't really take into account in the original post is the fact that pre-2013 pension benefits are increased on the principle of wage parity (at the discretion of the minister) whereas Single Scheme benefits are increased in line with CPI. It'd be interesting to know whether public sector workers wages have kept up (or surpassed inflation?) and whether these trends are likely to continue in the future.

Another way of expressing the effect of the ASC reduction for Single Scheme workers is by assessing its value as an equivalent salary bump. For the 50k worker this is a bit more complicated to work out but for the 80k and 100k workers the ASC reduction is effectively the equivalent of a €3885 and €5635 gross salary bump pa (assuming 52% tax rate). This works out to an approx 4.85% and 5.64% increased salary vs pre-2013 workers respectively.

Thanks for this Ent. As someone who joined the PS in 2018 and will be 65 all too soon I am extremely interested. Are there advisers out there who are knowledgable about this.

Happy the post may be of some assistance. I'm a layman so if there's someone more informed about these issues it'd be a big help for them to chip in if I've gotten anything wrong! I've personally found it frustrating there's so little info out there about the Single Scheme so thought I'd take the punt.

It strikes me that the true value of having final salary pension lies in being a career public servant i.e. being someone who works in the public service all their life, banks the #years and sees a huge increase in salary over that time.

If you're someone planning on dipping into the public service for 5 / 10 years the Single Scheme could arguably leave you better off financially, particularly if you're doing it on a higher salary (AP / PO).
 
Last edited:
Analysing the Value of SPSPS Contributions

The contributions that SPSPS Members pay towards their pension are calculated as follows:
  • 3% of Gross Salary
  • 3.5% of Gross Salary less 2x the current value of the State Pension
  • Additional Superannuation Contribution at the following rates;
    • 3.33% on salary between €34,500 – €60,000
    • 3.5% on salary at €60,000+
Tax relief is available on all of the above at the Scheme Member’s marginal tax rate (20% or 40%).

For the purposes of this post annual state pension is assumed to be €13k PA.

This means at the following salaries SPSPS members will pay the following contributions and receive the following benefits on retirement (assuming, hypothetically, the individual's salary was consistent through their career):

SalaryAnnual Contribution
(Gross)
Annual Contribution (Net)Pension on Retirement after 40 YearsLump Sum on Retirement After 40 YearsPension Benefits Capital Value (Male, Married, NRA 66) (40 Years)Total Contributions (Net) (40 Years) Capital Value Efficiency Of Contribution
(i.e. Total Capital Value of Benefits / Net Contributions over 40 Years)
Total Gross Contributions
After 40 Years
€30,000€1040€832€2,000€45,000€91,800€33,2802.8x€36,000
€35,000€1,382€1,105€4,500€52,500€157,800€44,2003.6x€55,240
€40,000€1,873€1,124€7,000€60,000€223,800€44,9605.0x€74,920
€50,000€2,587€1,714€12,000€75,000€355,800€68,5605.2x€114,280
€60,000€3,840€2,304€17,000€90,000€487,800€92,1605.3x€153,600
€70,000€4,840€2,904€22,000€105,000€619,800€116,1605.3x€193,600
€80,000€5,840€3,504€27,000€120,000€751,800€140,1605.4x€233,600
€90,000€6,840€4,104€32,000€135,000€883,800€164,1605.4x€273,600
€100,000€7,840€4,704€37,000€150,000€1,015,800€188,1605.4x€313,600

The above table is inflation neutral. The capital value efficiency of contributions might be higher in practice because of inflation. However, this doesn't matter for assessing the how efficient contributions are between scheme members at different salary levels.

Contributions to the SPSPS clearly start to become more efficient at higher salary levels. Anyone making less than €40k per year seems to get a bad deal in terms of return on the contributions they make. Diminishing returns on the efficiency of contributions start to kick in at circa 45K/50K.

I’m not getting into calculating how the pension received would be taxed on retirement because tbh I’m not arsed. As almost all of the final pension benefit figures are below the 40% tax rate after tax credits, I’m assuming tax won’t make a huge difference to the real value of the pension received after tax?

The following table imagines what would happen if you took the amount of money you contributed to the SPSPS at certain salary levels and stuck it in an AVC instead:

SalaryContribution Rate (Gross)
(Per Month)
Capital Value of Main Scheme Benefits
(30 Years)
Value in AVC at 6% Growth Rate
(30 Years)
Value in AVC at 8% Growth Rate
(30 Years)
€30,000€86.67€68,850€86,459€128,275
€60,000€320€365,850€323,052€480,094
€80,000€487€563,850€491.645€730,644

Benefits received under the main scheme rise rather than decrease with inflation. The table above envisions a 0% inflation scenario. You could also imagine that there's an inflation rate of 2% and the 6% column = 8% and the 8% column = a very optimistic 10%. Realistically any amount of inflation over the period will decrease the value of the AVCs quite significantly.

Conclusion: At salary levels above 55K and a time horizon of 30 years, pension contributions to the Single Scheme seem to be broadly equivalent to a risk free gross roll-up investment of 6.5% PA pre-tax that rises with inflation. This seems like a pretty good deal.

Conclusion 2: Members of the Single Scheme with salaries less than 40k are arguably getting shafted.

Conclusion 3: As a Single Scheme member you would ideally gun for a high salary as early as possible to ensure that a greater proportion of your pension benefits on retirement arise from contributions to the main scheme rather than AVCs.
 
Last edited:
It'd be interesting to know whether public sector workers wages have kept up (or surpassed inflation?) and whether these trends are likely to continue in the future.
Average weekly earnings in the public sector (excluding overtime) are up 13% 2008Q3 to 2021Q3. That's as long as the series goes back. Comparable private sector earnings increased 19%.

HICP is up 6% only over the period.
 
Interesting. I wonder how much of the disparity between public sector wage growth and CPI in the period can be attributed to public sector pay cuts in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis and deflation as a direct consequence of same?

Some thoughts about the Purchase Facility:

Thoughts on the Single Scheme Purchase and Transfer Facility
  • Basic information about the Single Scheme purchase and transfer facilities is set out in the first post above.
  • The purchase facility seems like a trap. Essentially, what it allows you to do is pre-purchase state-backed annuities at a 25:1 ratio prior to retirement. These annuities grow in line with CPI and will be actuarily reduced if you retire early.
  • Purchasing annuities in this way means you forego investing the same amount of money in an AVC.
  • If the growth you can get through an AVC is enough to beat inflation and any growth in the cost of providing annuities in the future, then investing in AVCs first and then transferring the AVC Pot over to facility will mean you can buy more pension benefits for the same up-front cost.
  • You can't split an AVC / AVC-PRSA pot to purchase annuities through the facility. This means that if you wanted to purchase some annuities through the transfer facility but not spend the total amount you've invested you'd need a separate pension pot for it (e.g. a AVC-PRSA).
  • You can only buy benefits that you might have ordinarily earned under the scheme had you maintained a more consistent salary level / not had gaps in service (e.g. due to career break). The facilities can't be used to fund for the gap in maximum pension benefits created by State Pension or to make up for the scheme benefits only providing a 50% spouses pension. So it’s not like you can totally max out an AVC and then convert it into an equivalent value in scheme pension.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. I wonder how much of the disparity between public sector wage growth and CPI in the period can be attributed to public sector pay cuts in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis and deflation as a direct consequence of same?
The 2009 pension levy was not recorded as a "pay cut" by the CSO believe it or not!

Private sector wage growth was very flat but really took off about 2017 to date.
 
Thank you @Ent319 You are certainly correct about one thing, the amount of info given to us 'new entrants' about Single Pension scheme is practically nil!
I can't help but feel the joiners post 2013 are very much shafted. Many 'old timers' get a promotion very close to end of their career & it is worth phenomenal amount of money for them in their pension. They are very often not the best person for the job but sure the unions stand over all this.
 
Hi @Sunnygirl69 glad you found it helpful.

It's not all bad for Single Scheme Members imo. "Lifers" on pre-2013 schemes can of course get away with murder by getting promotion later in their career. However, the maths above suggests that if you're in the single scheme and have an AP's / HEOs salary and are clever about how you invest in an AVC you can end up not too far off the capital value of a person with a pre-2013 pension for similar amounts of contributions. Additionally, if you're a non-lifer and only want a short 5-10 year career in the public service, you can be better off by miles by being in the Single Scheme because you're paying much less ASC.

There's advantages to having a portion of your pension pot in a private AVC as well. A pre-2013 member's entire pension effectively dies with them, subject to paying of spouse's benefit and children's benefit. If you croak and have a big AVC that can go to your family, and they get spouse's benefit / children's benefit too.

Also, I'd say that as a greater proportion of the unions' members become SPSPS members, you'll find them pushing for more favourable options for SPSPS members.

Finally, I'd also point out that since I made the post above inflation has been absolutely rampant, and as a Single Scheme member the pension benefits I've banked will be uprated much more than my pre-2013 colleagues. Funny how things can change in a year!
 
This is a great thread, thanks Ent.

With inflation currently so high, SPSS retired members are doing a lot better than pre-2013 retirees:

-SPSS is inflation linked with no cap. For Dec 2022 it was 8.2% per CSO
-Pre-2013 retirees have their pension linked to those in their grade they retired at (so looking at 5% increase for 2022, that was 1% 1 Feb, 4% backdates to 2 Feb and 1% Oct)

The current SPSS bill for the State for anyone retired since 2014 will be low (as you'd have max 9 years of service 2014-2022), so an 8.2% increase will still be small.
But as more members retire on SPSS into the future, having no max inflation cap could be extremely costly in the future.
 
So the SPSS is inflation linked. My wife has time under the old scheme as a nurse. Is the old scheme eligible for inflation increases too ?
 
But as more members retire on SPSS into the future, having no max inflation cap could be extremely costly in the future.
That's true for the last six months but I doubt it in future.

Over the long term public sector wages have increased above inflation. The de facto linkage of pre-SPSS pensions to wages means that in general pensioners will do better than SPSS pensions to inflation.
 
To summarise, if you join the public service and have an existing private pension, generally it seems the better option to maintain that private pension (with no further contributions) until close to retirement and then decide whether it is worthwhile purchasing Single Scheme benefits?

Are there any particular requirements if one wants to make AVCs while part of the single scheme? Can you use any AVC provider?
 
So the SPSS is inflation linked. My wife has time under the old scheme as a nurse. Is the old scheme eligible for inflation increases too ?
I don't think so. Uprating for people under the old scheme is determined by the wages paid to people in equivalent grades who are currently working.

That's true for the last six months but I doubt it in future.

Over the long term public sector wages have increased above inflation. The de facto linkage of pre-SPSS pensions to wages means that in general pensioners will do better than SPSS pensions to inflation.
This was true in the past but may not always be the case. The war in the Ukraine's showed how fragile global supply chains are and the impact this can have on inflation. Also, maybe as single scheme members become the majority in unions they'll negotiate better deals for single scheme members (e.g. via bonuses, which may not count as salary and may not lead to uprating for old scheme members!)

To summarise, if you join the public service and have an existing private pension, generally it seems the better option to maintain that private pension (with no further contributions) until close to retirement and then decide whether it is worthwhile purchasing Single Scheme benefits?

Are there any particular requirements if one wants to make AVCs while part of the single scheme? Can you use any AVC provider?
This is my take, yes. That pension will grow tax free for decades. If it's in a good fund it could grow at 8%.

Compare that to spending the money now to buy an annuity. The annuity will only ever grow at the rate of inflation. So if you think the stock market can beat inflation it makes sense to keep the pension / invest in AVCs and decide whether to transfer over later.

There aren't any particular requirements if one wants to make AVCs as part of the single scheme. Most orgs will be signed up to an AVC scheme. Many are on the Forsa Scheme sold by Cornmarket. It's got decent rates. 0% contributes fees and an AMC of 1% on 0-40,000, 0.75% on 40,000 to 140,000, and 0.5% thereafter. Cornmarket's default funds are crap - you can select the other Irish life funds.
 
Last edited:
This was true in the past but may not always be the case.
I simply do not believe that over the course of decades that public sector wages will increase at a rate below inflation.

Here is euro area real wages since 1996. For sure the last 3 years has been a collapse due to inflation but if you look over the long term you see an upward trend.

fredgraph.png


If I had a choice at 65 between wage-linked and inflation-linked retirement income I would take the former.
 
If I had a choice at 65 between wage-linked and inflation-linked retirement income I would take the former.
You're right it's probably a safer bet and if I had the choice I'd probably choose the same. Inflation linking is very valuable though and who's to say how things will work out.
 
Back
Top