As has already been pointed out this would be illegal, so no.
As has already been pointed out this would be illegal, so no.Also the Chairperson offered the parties to negotiate, is this to say we could negotiate a higher rent ?
I wonder would that strategy work in the current environment?You should consider a cash incentive to the tenant to leave.
Everyone has a price.
I agree perhaps difficult.I wonder would that strategy work in the current environment?
That could be quite a material sum, particularly given the fact that it wouldn’t be tax deductible.But something like “Find a place in the next three months and we’ll pay your deposit and two months rent upfront” might get the tenant looking extra hard.
Something's gone wrong there. There are over holding cases are coming up for hearing after about 4 - 5 months at the moment. You need to escalate. Email, call, send a registered letter, etc etc.We are now one year exactly since lodging with the RTB and each time we call to seek any form of feedback we get advised "there is no feedback just keep waiting"
Totally agree with this fact, the frustrating piece is the overholding tenant may have found some where to go when his notice was actually up.I wonder would that strategy work in the current environment?
The rental market is so gummed up because of the RPZ madness that a tenant may have literally nowhere else to go - at pretty much any price.
thanks, just checked we received written email confirmation that it was all received ok, in June. Lodged in April. We will send another email and a written registered copy y post, also summarizing every phone call made to them.Something's gone wrong there. There are over holding cases are coming up for hearing after about 4 - 5 months at the moment. You need to escalate. Email, call, send a registered letter, etc etc.
I know that if a receiver takes over a property then rent becomes payable to the receiver. A friend of mine about ten years ago was paying rent to PWC. AFAIK that was a developer or large institutional landlord and not a private individual though.2. If a bank takes over a property from the former owner, what process does the bank need to go to remove a tenant thats in situ at time of foreclosure ?
Hi Can I ask the following specific questions:
1. Any posters have any other info on actual overholding situations and how long it took to get to the RTB adjudication hearing ?
...
Have me hanging in suspense....so whats happened after Feb 22 ? Are they now out ?1. Any posters have any other info on actual overholding situations and how long it took to get to the RTB adjudication hearing ?
Here's my experience
Some timeline information
Sept 2019. Notice of termination
May 2020 notice expires
Covid delays
Jan 2021 apply for Adjudication
Apr 2021 virtual hearing
May 2021 Determination issued
June 21 days to vacate
More delays
Sept 2021 apply to District court
Feb 2022 Court order
Yes they did leave , the court gave 21 days and out he went The house has been redecorated, Marketed and sold .Have me hanging in suspense....so whats happened after Feb 22 ? Are they now out ?
cheers for reply.
The tenant did not show up for the District court hearing and left me on the hook for the expenses . It is a win as far as I am concerned. I could take a judgment out but my lawyer said theres no point .Yes they did leave , the court gave 21 days and out he went The house has been redecorated, Marketed and sold .
The RTB will support you and pay legal costs in certain circumstances. It's not well known but worth a look.I could take a judgment out but my lawyer said theres no point .
That is so wrong. Lawyer say not worth going after the tenant. It has to be changed that even if the tenant is on benefit/social welfare they should have funds deducted at source.The tenant did not show up for the District court hearing and left me on the hook for the expenses . It is a win as far as I am concerned. I could take a judgment out but my lawyer said theres no point .