C
chico
Guest
My dad applied for a mortgage through a mortgage broker and it was approved and he received an offer letter. All his financial details were supplied to the mortgage broker early in the process and he has signed contracts with the seller based on the offer letter. The broker rang him yesterday to say they made a mistake and did not submit his maintenance payments as part of his outgoings. when they sent his details to the bank The bank noticed this when they got the separation agreement. There is no question that the broker knew of this information from the start but made a mistake and did not supply it to the bank. Now even though everything is ready to go, the bank now won't send the cheque to this solicitor because of this problem. Apparently the offer letter from the bank does not say that the loan is subject to receiving the separation agreement.
The solicitor is on his side but has advised that my dad may be open to being sued by the sellers because contracts have been signed and are legally binding. Not to mention the fact that he has ordered about €10k worth of furniture etc for the house.
My feeling is that this is a mistake of the mortgage broker's doing and they need to sort this out with the bank. Saying that I don't know anything about the legal situation here.
The mortgage broker is saying that they can still get the loan by applying to a sub-prime lender which of course is going to increase the repayments significantly so is not an option.
Has anyone been in a similar situation in the past or know what the legal position on this might be?
The solicitor is on his side but has advised that my dad may be open to being sued by the sellers because contracts have been signed and are legally binding. Not to mention the fact that he has ordered about €10k worth of furniture etc for the house.
My feeling is that this is a mistake of the mortgage broker's doing and they need to sort this out with the bank. Saying that I don't know anything about the legal situation here.
The mortgage broker is saying that they can still get the loan by applying to a sub-prime lender which of course is going to increase the repayments significantly so is not an option.
Has anyone been in a similar situation in the past or know what the legal position on this might be?