Legal Source of The Consumer’s Entitlement for Repair / Replace / Refund.

One

Registered User
Messages
218

The National Consumer Agency have issued written material (small little cards)stating that a consumer who has not received merchantable goods or goods fit for purpose is entitled to repair / replace / refund. But what is the legal source of these rights? Case law or statutes? I could not find this right expressly written in the Sales of Goods Act 1980.
 
section 10 of the Act

Implied undertakings as to quality or fitness.
14.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act and of any statute in that behalf, there is no implied condition or warranty as to the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied under a contract of sale.

(2) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business there is an implied condition that the goods supplied under the contract are of merchantable quality, except that there is no such condition—
( a ) as regards defects specifically drawn to the buyer's attention before the contract is made, or

( b ) if the buyer examines the goods before the contract is made, as regards defects which that examination ought to have revealed.

(3) Goods are of merchantable quality if they are as fit for the purpose or purposes for which goods of that kind are commonly bought and as durable as it is reasonable to expect having regard to any description applied to them, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances, and any reference in this Act to unmerchantable goods shall be construed accordingly.

(4) where the seller sells goods in the course of a business and the buyer, expressly or by implication, makes known to the seller any particular purpose for which the goods are being bought, there is an implied condition that the goods supplied under the contract are reasonably fit for that purpose, whether or not that is a purpose for which such goods are commonly supplied, except where the circumstances show that the buyer does not rely, or that it is unreasonable for him to rely, on the seller's skill or judgement.

then
21.—For section 53 of the Act of 1893 there shall be substituted the section set out in the following Table:
TABLE​
Remedy for breach of warranty
53.—(1) Subject to subsection (2), where there is a breach of warranty by the seller, or where the buyer elects, or is compelled, to treat any breach of a condition on the part of the seller as a breach of warranty, the buyer is not by reason only of such breach of warranty entitled to reject the goods, but he may—
( a ) set up against the seller the breach of warranty in diminution or extinction of the price, or
( b ) maintain an action against the seller for damages for the breach of warranty.
(2) Where—
( a ) the buyer deals as consumer and there is a breach of a condition by the seller which, but for this subsection, the buyer would be compelled to treat as a breach of warranty, and
( b ) the buyer, promptly upon discovering the breach, makes a request to the seller that he either remedy the breach or replace any goods which are not in conformity with the condition,
then, if the seller refuses to comply with the request or fails to do so within a reasonable time, the buyer is entitled:
(i) to reject the goods and repudiate the contract, or
(ii) to have the defect constituting the breach remedied elsewhere and to maintain an action against the seller for the cost thereby incurred by him.
 
Back
Top